Seattle researcher examines environmental
causes for juvenile diabetes
By CAROL SMITH
SEATTLE POST-INTELLIGENCER REPORTER
The trend is disturbing: Juvenile diabetes, a disease that can cost people
their kidneys, their eyesight, even their limbs later in life, has been steadily
claiming more victims during the past few decades.
And no one knows why.
While the rate of adult-onset diabetes has also been going up, that's easier
to figure out. Our super-sized, couch-potato culture is making people heavier, a
known risk factor for diabetes in adulthood.
But juvenile diabetes is a different story. Although scientists have sorted
out a number of the genetic factors responsible for putting kids at risk, they
believe at least half the chance of getting diabetes is related to the child's
environment.
Paul Joseph Brown / P-I
Dr. Bill Hagopian of the Pacific
Northwest Research Foundation received a $5 million grant to study
environmental factors causing juvenile diabetes.
"It can't just be genes," said Dr. Bill Hagopian, a researcher with the
Pacific Northwest Research Foundation in Seattle. The number of children
diagnosed with the disease has been increasing about 3 percent a year since
1980, he said.
Hagopian recently received a five-year, $5 million grant from the National
Institutes of Health to help conduct the first large-scale attempt to discern
the environmental factors that cause one kid to get juvenile diabetes, and
another to grow up unscathed.
If successful, it could lead to potential ways to prevent or cut down on the
disease, which affects about 1 in 300 children, and costs billions in U.S.
health dollars every year.
It could also serve as a model approach for unraveling the intricacies of
genetic-environmental interactions in many other chronic diseases.
"Cancer is a great example of a disease where there is clearly genetic
predisposition . . . but also many environmental causes," Hagopian said.
But environmental contribution to disease is notoriously difficult to study,
in part because it relies on study participants keeping laborious,
detail-oriented diaries. And until recently, it was impossible to separate the
contribution of underlying genetic differences.
Hagopian, however, had an idea for a way to get around that problem.
He went to a vast, untapped database locked away in state Health Department
file cabinets. That data, based on "blood spots" banked from newborn heel
sticks, contains the genetic codes of all the babies born in Washington since
the 1960s. The blood samples were initially taken to screen for metabolic
disorders, such as sickle-cell anemia.
Two years ago, Hagopian contacted a half-million Washington families to ask
whether he could test their children's blood spots for the genes thought to
contribute to diabetes. That study, which ended up testing about 32,500 samples,
proved the feasibility of identifying high-risk kids using blood spots. He hopes
to use a similar approach to identify a new group of about 300 high-risk babies
to follow for the long-term study.
As many as 20 genes are linked to juvenile, or Type 1, diabetes, although two
in particular seem most strongly linked. The combination of genes you wind up
with in the genetic lottery determines your risk.
But it's a sliding scale.
Even having the riskiest assortment of genes -- a combination that affects
about 17 percent of the population -- is no guarantee of getting the disease.
Only one in 80 of these children will come down with the disease. The question
is which ones.
Once Hagopian identifies a group of high-risk children, he hopes to follow
them for at least five years, and hopefully longer, to see which develop the
disease. The highest incidence of juvenile diabetes occurs around age 12, so the
researchers hope to follow the kids that long.
They are still designing the research parameters and don't expect to begin
recruiting families to participate in the study until the fall. Families would
keep food diaries and children would have to provide periodic blood and stool
samples to track various exposures.
In addition to Seattle, the study will involve children in five other
clinical centers in the United States, Germany, Sweden and Finland.
The overall goal is to identify strategies to keep children from getting
diabetes.
"What if you could, say, avoid rutabagas and coxsackieviruses," Hagopian
said. "What if those two things alone reduced disease by 80 percent?"
Researchers are still deciding which environmental factors to track, but they
have some leads.
"We think early exposure to non-breast milk proteins, especially those in
cow's milk, may play a role," he said. "And gluten (a protein found in wheat).
It's very clear if babies are exposed to gluten in the first three months, you
have a much higher risk." Infants could be exposed to gluten in formula.
Some preliminary studies indicate the risk increases five-fold.
In addition, there is some evidence that exposure to Vitamin D, certain fatty
acids, and some common gastrointestinal viruses, such as the coxsackievirus, may
be linked to development of diabetes.
Scientists believe it's something about early exposure that conditions the
body to get the disease. For example, about one-third of children born to
mothers who had German measles while pregnant end up with diabetes.
"That tells you an exposure even as early as the womb can predispose to
diabetes," Hagopian said.
Jamie Harmon of Seattle, mother of a 4-year-old who had his blood spot
tested, is hoping the information will eventually lead to better treatment for
diabetes, or prevent it altogether.
She doesn't know her son's results yet, but said she would be more likely to
catch early signs of the disease if she knew her son was genetically predisposed
to getting diabetes.
Although there's no history of juvenile diabetes in her family, she has a
Scandinavian heritage, and Scandinavian countries have a higher incidence of
Type 1 diabetes.
"The more information you have about it, the sooner you can take action," she
said.
Harmon, a diabetes researcher herself, has seen the ravaging effect the
disease can have.
"A lot of people think you just take some insulin and you're fine," she said.
"But it's a nasty disease."
DISCLAIMER:
All information, data, and material contained, presented, or provided here
is for general information purposes only and is not to be construed as
reflecting the knowledge or opinions of the publisher, and is not to be
construed or intended as providing medical or legal advice. The decision
whether or not to vaccinate is an important and complex issue and should
be made by you, and you alone, in consultation with your health care
provider.
"A foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth."
-- Albert Einstein, letter to a friend, 1901
"I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves, and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education."
-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to William C. Jarvis, September 28, 1820
"What's the point of vaccination if it doesn't protect you from the unvaccinated?"
-- Sandy Gottstein
"Who gets to decide what the greater good is and how many will be sacrificed to it?"