A separate oral abstract session on vaccines against potential bioweapons
was moderated by Richard Duma, MD, PhD, of the Halifax Medical Center.
M.A. Bailey (USAMRIID)
[6] presented information on cytolytic
T-lymphocyte responses to Ebola virus. The characterization of cellular
immune responses to Ebola virus and identification of expedient ways to
detect such activity represent essential early steps in the development
and testing of an effective vaccine. Using a Venezuelan equine
encephalitis (VEE) replicon model to express a variety of Ebola virus
genes, the investigator found that interferon enzyme linked
immunoabsorbent spot (ELISPOT) assays were generally predictive of
cytolytic activity. Clinical correlation was reported even with single
epitopes in an adoptive transfer model in mice; this work is now being
applied in nonhuman primates (NHPs), in which single VEE replicon models
have not been very successful, so that combination gene replicons may be
studied.
An abstract regarding a potential intranasal plague vaccine
from the ID Biomedical Corporation of Quebec and USAMRIID was presented
next by Taff (David H.) Jones, of the ID Biomedical Corporation of Quebec.[7]
Dr. Jones reviewed data demonstrating that intramuscular injection of
recombinant vaccines containing Yersinia pestis F1 (capsular) and V
(virulence-associated) antigens do not provide protection against
high-dose challenge with primary pneumonic plague in NHPs. When an
intranasally administered adjuvanted proteosome that contained an F1/V
fusion protein was used, however, mice developed high local and systemic
antibody responses and were protected against pneumonic plague. Of course,
it is difficult to extrapolate findings from small animal studies, and
studies are now planned to see whether such indications of protection
occur in NHPs. A notable barrier to this approach, though, is that neither
the proteosome technology nor the use of mucosal adjuvants (eg, the
lipopolysaccharide that was used in this study) is currently licensed for
use in humans.
Douglas S. Reed and his colleagues, from USAMRIID,[8]
presented current data from their work toward the development of a vaccine
against VEE. The equine encephalitides are considered Category B
biowarfare agents. VEE is an example of an illness that is rarely fatal
(death occurs in only 1% to 5% of cases) but causes rapid-onset,
incapacitating febrile illness.[9] Since current vaccines for
VEE have issues related to reactogenicity, immunogenicity, and efficacy,
site-directed mutagenesis of virulent VEE was performed and mutant clones
were subsequently isolated and studied. Using one such clone called V3226,
the investigators observed immunogenicity in mice and protection against
parenteral and aerosol VEE challenges. Applying the work to NHPs, it was
found that NHPs were protected against viremia after VEE aerosol exposure
of several different types. A phase 1 clinical trial of this genetically
modified live attenuated VEE vaccine is planned.
J. Rusnak and colleagues[10] presented another study from
USAMRIID on the immunogenicity of a pentavalent botulinum toxoid (PBT)
vaccine. It should be noted that there are no commercially available
vaccines for botulism, although antiserum can be used therapeutically. Dr.
Rusnak's presentation highlighted the diminished immunogenicity observed
in current lots of PBT, especially with respect to toxins B and E.
Specifically, it appears that protective titers of antitoxin B and E
antibodies are not consistently achieved or maintained in vaccine
recipients, suggesting a decline in vaccine potency. It was postulated
that the decrease in potency may be related to the age of the current lot.
Although clinical botulism presents similarly in cases of natural
(food-borne) ingestion of botulinum toxin and potentially
bioterrorism-related cases, botulism can also be transmitted by
aerosolized toxin, and presentation may differ in such cases. Of note as
well is that botulism can also be caused by in vivo production of toxin as
occurs in infant botulism (GI tract source) and wound botulism.
Food- and water-borne enteric pathogens are considered Category B
agents related to the degree of debilitation that is caused. Stephen J.
Savarino, MC, USN, of the Naval Medical Research Center,[11]
next presented the results of an Egyptian pediatric trial of an oral,
inactivated whole-cell enterotoxigenic E coli (ETEC)/cholera toxin
B subunit vaccine. Unfortunately, despite the finding that 95% of 152
vaccinated infants and toddlers developed antibodies to ETEC, no
significant protection against nonsevere ETEC diarrhea was found
(protective efficacy ~20%) as compared with nonvaccinated controls.
The final abstract presented in the session was entitled "Expected but
Unusual Rashes in Adults After First Vaccinia Vaccination." Richard
Greenberg, MD, of the University of Kentucky,[12] presented
some preliminary data on the safety of a next-generation, cell-cultured
smallpox vaccine (CCSV). Grown in MRC-5 cell cultures, CCSV is derived
from the same New York City Board of Health (NYCBH) strain utilized by the
live-attenuated Vaccinia virus vaccine, Dryvax, which is currently
being administered in the United States Smallpox Vaccination Program.
Nine of 250 (3.6%) volunteers inoculated with CCSV developed rashes; 6
cases were discussed. A number of atypical patterns of exanthem were
found, including dermatophytic, morbilliform, and hand foot and mouth
disease-like patterns. Like the rashes associated with standard Vaccinia
vaccination, they occurred between 1 and 2 weeks after vaccine inoculation
and resolved within a week. Of course more information will be needed on
such reactions and other safety considerations before they can be assessed
in comparison with standard smallpox vaccines.
One potential BT agent not discussed at this meeting was ricin, a toxin
extracted from castor beans. Ricin can be spread via injection (the route
of an assassination of a Bulgarian national in 1978), inhalation, or via
food or water. Studies on potential vaccines against ricin intoxication,
including an oral immunization of ricin toxoid in biodegradable polymeric
microspheres, have been progressing.[13]
Given the current atmosphere regarding the real and/or potential threat
of biological agents being used in warfare and terrorism, it is not
surprising that research and development activities involving BT-agent
related vaccines have increased substantially since the NFID Annual
Vaccine Conference began half a decade ago. Biological agents as weapons
of mass destruction have earned a prominent position on the agenda of most
infectious disease and public health meetings since 22 anthrax cases,
including 5 deaths, resulted from bioterrorist attacks in the United
States in 2001. This trend is certain to persist as prevention, infection
control, and disease management initiatives, including vaccine and drug
development programs, continue to gain momentum.
Medscape Infectious Diseases 5(1), 2003. © 2003 Medscape