In both abstract plenary sessions and topic sessions, there were several
investigations of otitis media (OM) that pediatricians would find
interesting. Since practice patterns suggest that approximately 60% of the
antibiotics prescribed for children are to treat OM,
[7]
thinking about how this common pediatric clinical problem is diagnosed and
treated is always worthwhile.
Bullous Myringitis
In an abstract presentation, David McCormick, MD,[8] of the
University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, reported the results of a
study that attempted to determine whether bullous myringitis was a
"severe" form of OM. This case-control study identified patients aged 6
months to 12 years with signs and symptoms of acute OM. The investigation
excluded OM patients with effusion (OME), attempting to exclude children
with sterile effusions who did not have acute infection. Children were
also excluded if they had myringotomy tubes or craniofacial anomalies.
Parents reported a symptom score for their children, and the degree of
middle ear disease was graded using video otoscopy and trained scorers
(all pediatricians). A tympanic membrane with erythema, bulging, and a
bulla (bullous myringitis) was considered the most severe classification.
Children with erythema, opacity, and bulging without bulla comprised the
classification just below the bullae group in severity. In the cohort, 518
subjects had acute OM, and 41 (8%) had bullous myringitis. The 41 cases
were then matched to control subjects based on ethnicity, age, and gender.
There were no differences between cases and controls for number of hours
spent in daycare, duration of breast-feeding, tobacco smoke exposure, and
prior OM history. Although the children with bullous myringitis had
temperatures that were similar to those of children without this
diagnosis, they did have significantly higher symptom scores as assessed
by parents.
The authors concluded that bullous myringitis is a more severe form of
OM. Their take-home message is that parents of children with bullous
myringitis may be less likely to consider "watchful waiting" compared with
parents of children with OM and no bullae.
Choice of Antibiotics for Otitis Media
In an invited platform session, Dr. McCormick also gave an overview of
current issues in diagnosing and treating OM.[9] He focused on
whether antibiotic treatment is necessary for mild cases of OM, and on the
changing flora involved in OM since the advent of conjugate vaccines
against H influenzae type b and S pneumoniae.
The presentation began with a review of unpublished data from a study
McCormick and colleagues are completing with funding from the Agency for
Healthcare Research and Quality. The ongoing investigation is evaluating
outcomes in children with nonsevere acute OM (n = 129 so far), and half of
the participants are being treated with placebo instead of amoxicillin.[9]
The goal is to determine the differences in short-term outcomes for
children treated vs not treated with antibiotics for nonsevere acute OM.
The authors define "failure" as need for change in antibiotics within a
10-day period. Investigators were blinded as to patient medication, so any
treatment change was approached as if it were an antibiotic failure. To
date, groups have been very similar with regard to the occurrence of
failure rates, with 30% of the placebo group and 26% of the treatment
group experiencing "failure." However, the groups showed differences in
the timing of experiencing failure. The placebo group experienced failure
mostly during the first 10 days after diagnoses, compared with 14 to 28
days in the treated group.
On the basis of these data, McCormick suggested that many children with
nonsevere acute OM (no bullae on the tympanic membrane) could be watched
and not treated initially with antibiotics. He contends that children who
"fail" the placebo approach will do so within 10 days of the index visit,
so any worsening of symptoms in the week after the index visit would
suggest the need to treat with antibiotics.
Changing Pathogens in OM
Data from 2 other investigations that demonstrated how the use of newer
vaccines is changing the "face" of OM were also reviewed by Dr. McCormick.
Published data from Fireman and coauthors[10] revealed that the
pneumococcal conjugate vaccine produced a 7% reduction in episodes of OM
(defined in that study as including acute OM and OME) and a 24% reduction
in myringotomy tube placement in a large Kaiser-Permanente cohort.
McCormick believes that the rate of decrease in acute OM in the future
will actually be greater than 7%, since the percentage identified in that
study included children with OME. He suggested that in the short term we
will see improvement in the burden of OM, especially with regard to
children needing myringotomy tube placement.
Finally, Dr. McCormick reviewed data on the changing face of the
organisms involved in OM, presented earlier in the PAS 2003 meeting by
Stan Block, MD.[11] Dr. Block reported bacterial culture
isolate results obtained by office myringotomy from 2 cohorts: (1)
isolates collected before the use of pneumococcal conjugate vaccine, and
(2) isolates collected after the pneumococcal vaccine became available.
In the pre-pneumococcal conjugate vaccine cohort, approximately 30% of
patients with acute OM had non-typeable H influenzae isolated from
the middle ear. That rate has now increased to 52%. In addition,
nonvaccine strains of pneumococcus have almost doubled in the same time
period, and now comprise 3.5% of all bacteria isolated. The good news is
that the pneumoccoccal isolates carrying most pneumococcal resistance are
included in the 7-valent vaccine and comprise a declining proportion of
isolates.
There were several take-home messages from Dr. McCormick's
presentation:
- Many children will still do well without treatment for acute OM,
and those who experience treatment failures will do so within 10
days of diagnosis.
- Pneumococcal conjugate vaccine will have a significant impact on
OM, with a large reduction in the number of children who will
require myringotomy tubes.
- A short-term decline in the problems of pneumococcal resistance
may also be seen since most of the resistant organisms are included
in the current vaccine and appear to be declining in frequency. More
information on this topic is provided in a recently published
article by Whitney.[12]
- H influenzae is increasing as a pathogen in acute OM, as
are nonvaccine pneumococcal strains. This change in flora may be
helpful in the short term, but may also lead to the need to adjust
or revise pneumococcal vaccine components.
Medscape Pediatrics 5(2), 2003. © 2003 Medscape