Return to Vaccination News Home Page __» Right-click to "open in new window"
Subscribe to the Vaccination NewsLetter
View past & current Scandals (columns by Sandy Mintz)
Search This Site using keywords
http://www2.epediatricnews.com/scripts/om.dll/serve?article=aqp030370701
![]() |
July 2003 • Volume 37 • Number 7
|
News |
More expensive than injected
FluMist Licensed For Ages 5-49 Years
Miriam E. Tucker
Senior Writer
ATLANTA — The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices of the Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention has endorsed the use of FluMist as “an important
new option” for vaccinating healthy individuals aged 5-49 years.
The new intranasal trivalent, cold-adapted, live attenuated influenza vaccine
(LAIV) is manufactured by Medimmune Inc. and comarketed by Wyeth Vaccines. The
Food and Drug Administration licensed the vaccine the day before an ACIP
meeting, where the committee drafted recommendations for its use. Its label will
call for a two-dose regimen (60 days apart) for first use in healthy children
aged 5-8 years and one dose for individuals aged 9-49 years, FDA reviewer
ChrisAnna Mink told ACIP.
According to Dean Mason of the CDC's National Immunization Program, the
production target of FluMist for the 2003-2004 influenza season is expected to
be about 4-6 million doses. The vaccine will be shipped directly from Wyeth
Vaccines to U.S. physicians. The price range will be $45-$50 per dose, which few
health insurance companies are expected to cover the first year out.
“Most purchases in year one will be out-of-pocket to the consumer,” Mr. Mason
said, adding that coverage through the Vaccines for Children program also is
likely to prove problematic, due to both the cost and the storage requirements:
The vaccine must be kept frozen at less than 5° F or below.
American Academy of Pediatrics liaison Carol Baker said, “I think FluMist is a
useful addition to the influenza prevention program. It will give certain
families more choices.”
But, she added, “I would have liked to have seen a vaccine for younger children.
I think it will be much more useful when it's licensed for children down to at
least 12 months, and I'd like it for ages 6 months and above. I think the
company will be motivated to continue studies,” Dr. Baker, professor of
pediatrics and head of infectious diseases at Baylor College of Medicine,
Houston, said in an interview.
The AAP has posted guidance regarding FluMist on its Web site,
www.aap.org.
In clinical trials involving 544 healthy children aged 60-84 months, FluMist was
86%-93% effective in preventing influenza and was associated with a 30%
reduction in febrile otitis media.
Among 4,303 healthy working adults aged 18-64 years who were studied during
influenza outbreaks, the vaccine reduced the number of severe febrile illnesses
by 17% and febrile upper respiratory illnesses by 22%, the FDA's Dr. Mink
reported.
Assumed efficacy in children aged 9-17 years was extrapolated from the data in
younger children and in adults, she said.
Adverse reactions in both children and adults included runny nose, nasal
congestion, and headache. Children also experienced fever, occasional vomiting,
abdominal pain, and myalgias, while adults also reported sore throat. Most
reactions were self-limited; there were no serious adverse events.
The company originally had sought an indication for use in healthy people aged
1-64 years, but the FDA denied it because of a 3.53-fold increased risk for
asthma events after the first dose in children 12-59 months of age and because
the number of adults over age 50 studied (641) was not enough to demonstrate
efficacy.
Medimmune plans to gather more data to seek expanded indications for use in
adults aged 50-64 years, children less than 5 years, and high-risk populations,
said Dr. Edward M. Connor, the company's senior vice president for clinical
development.
The ACIP's document on FluMist (referred to as “LAIV”), which is still
undergoing minor revisions and is expected to be released in midsummer,
recommends the new product “as an option for vaccination of healthy persons aged
5-49 years, including persons in close contact with high-risk groups and those
wishing to avoid influenza.” Advantages include its potential to induce a broad
mucosal and systemic response, ease of administration, and the acceptability of
an intranasal rather than an intramuscular route of administration.
The list of people who should not receive LAIV includes all of the high-risk
groups for whom the injectable trivalent inactivated vaccine (TIV) is
recommended: People aged 50 years and older; those with high-risk chronic
pulmonary, metabolic, and immunosuppressive medical conditions; children
receiving aspirin or other salicylates; and pregnant women. Neither vaccine
should be used in people with a history of Guillain-Barré syndrome or those with
egg hypersensitivity.
It is unknown whether administering influenza antiviral medications affects the
safety or efficacy of LAIV, so the vaccine should not be administered until 48
hours following the cessation of antiviral therapy, nor should antivirals be
given for 2 weeks following receipt of the vaccine.
Also, there are no data on transmission of LAIV from vaccine recipients to
immunosuppressed contacts, so the use of the TIV is preferred for vaccinating
household members, health care workers, and others who have close contact with
immunosuppressed individuals because of the theoretical risk that a live vaccine
could be transmitted.
The committee discussed the transmission issue at length, particularly with
regard to health care workers. Committee members pointed out that currently
about 70% of health care workers do not receive yearly influenza vaccines—and
therefore pose an even greater risk of passing along the infection—and that in
surveys 15% of health care workers report a fear of needles.
The document will also include information about dosing and administration of
LAIV as well as storage, which could prove troublesome for some practices.
Because the defrost cycle temperature of most frost-free freezers is too warm
for FluMist, the vaccine must be kept in a special insulated box supplied by the
manufacturer. One ACIP liaison remarked that the box is quite large and may not
fit into the refrigerators that physicians currently have in their offices.
But James Young, Ph.D., Medimmune's president for research and development, told
this newspaper, “The vast majority of doctor's offices will accommodate the
FluMist freezer box, so we don't envision a storage problem for the vaccine.”
| Copyright © 2003 by International Medical News Group, an Elsevier company. Click for restrictions. |
Return to Vaccination News Home Page __» Right-click to "open in new window"
DISCLAIMER: All information, data, and material contained, presented, or provided here is for general information purposes only and is not to be construed as reflecting the knowledge or opinions of the publisher, and is not to be construed or intended as providing medical or legal advice. The decision whether or not to vaccinate is an important and complex issue and should be made by you, and you alone, in consultation with your health care provider.