Time to Purge
the Ipecac?
By Jennifer Huget
Tuesday, July 8, 2003; Page
HE01
Every parent knows the basics: Make sure your
family's diet sort of resembles the Food Pyramid. Limit
TV-viewing time. And keep a bottle of syrup of ipecac in
the medicine chest in case somebody swallows poison.
The first two edicts aren't likely to change any
time soon, though their nuances are always ripe for
debate. As for the third, let's just say it may soon be
time to kiss that long-familiar bottle goodbye.
Ipecac syrup is a plant-derived substance that's
been available without prescription in the United States
since 1965. Its only use is to induce vomiting. (It
works both mechanically, irritating the stomach lining
and causing a particularly unpleasant variety of puking
action, and neurologically, stimulating the part of the
brain that tells the body to hurl.)
A panel of physicians and poison control experts
last month advised the Food and Drug Administration
(FDA) to review ipecac syrup's status as an
over-the-counter drug. One of their major concerns was
abuse: It seems the substance has long been imbibed by
people with bulimia (and other eating disorders) to
facilitate the purging part of their condition.
Nobody knows just how widespread such abuse is,
but its dangers are clear: If overused, ipecac can
weaken muscles -- including the heart -- and eventually
cause death. Tomas Silber, a specialist in adolescent
medicine at the Children's National Medical Center in
Washington who spoke before the FDA panel, says
ipecac-induced vomiting by bulimics is usually carried
out in secret and is nearly impossible to quantify.
"We're seeing just the tip of the iceberg," he says.
Think that's unsettling? Well, it turns out that
bulimics aren't the only ipecac abusers. Silber says
that another uncountable number of people with a
condition called "Munchausen's syndrome by proxy" use
the stuff to sicken children -- so they can seek medical
attention.
These are awful circumstances, to be sure. But
should the actions of a relatively small number of
abusers warrant making a product unavailable to those
who would use it properly? After all, if nobody in the
household is an abuser, there's little harm in keeping
ipecac (which otherwise has few and rare negative side
effects) handy, just in case.
Unless, of course, having a bottle on hand offers
a sense of security that turns out to be false.
Even after close to 40 years of experience, nobody
can say for sure whether ipecac actually helps people
survive poisoning. Sure, it makes people vomit. But some
experts question whether that ultimately helps them
overcome the effects of the poison they've ingested.
It's not clear whether the stuff acts fast enough -- it
can take 20 minutes or longer to work its magic -- or
removes enough of the poisonous substance from the
stomach to make a difference.
Curtis Rosebraugh of the FDA's Division of
Over-the-Counter Drugs says ethical concerns make it
difficult for researchers to design studies to answer
these questions. As for the findings that do exist, he
says: "One group looking at the totality of the data
will say that it appears that ipecac doesn't really
benefit people. Another group can look at the same data
and say it's not so clear; maybe it does help."
In 2001, the nationwide network of poison control
centers handled 2,267,979 cases; callers were instructed
to administer ipecac in just 16,058 of these cases.
While recommendations for poison-related
"gastrointestinal decontamination" vary according to
circumstance, more common recommendations are
dilution/irrigation and activated charcoal -- though the
latter is nearly as controversial as ipecac.
Rose Ann Soloway of the American Association of
Poison Control Centers (AAPCC) says that while her
organization is in the process of reviewing its stance
regarding ipecac, many state poison control centers have
already ceased recommending its use.
It may take months or longer for the FDA to decide
whether to strip ipecac of its OTC status. That change
wouldn't mean that ipecac would simply move to
prescription-only status; individual manufacturers would
have to submit their products for FDA review. Silber
speculates that ipecac might not meet the FDA's
standards for prescription drugs' safety and efficacy.
If that happens, ipecac may soon be a thing of the past.
So what would we do in its absence?
Same thing we're supposed to be doing now: When
somebody ingests a poisonous substance, call the poison
control center to talk to a trained professional who can
evaluate the situation and offer accurate advice. The
Association of Poison Control Centers has established a
nationwide toll-free number that automatically connects
callers to the closest poison control center.
So, parents, here are the new basics: follow the
Food Pyramid, watch that TV time -- and memorize this
number (and post it by all your phones, and take it
along on vacation): 800-222-1222.•
The columns KidLife and MidLife, devoted to
healthy handling of children and adulthood, appear in
alternating weeks. Send comments, suggestions and
questions to kidmid@washpost.com. For U.S. Mail, see
address on Page F2. No calls, please.
© 2003 The Washington Post Company
|