Eczema:
Promise And Pox -
Drugs Improved, but
Smallpox Fears Loom
By Elizabeth Chang
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, July 8, 2003; Page
HE01
As the parent of a child with chronic eczema, I've
found the past year or so exciting -- and
nerve-wracking. Exciting because new treatments may
offer better alternatives to topical steroids -- until
now, the worrisome primary source of relief.
Nerve-wracking because in this era of all-too-possible
terrorist scenarios, it's been disconcerting to learn
that eczema patients and those in their households
should not, except under the most extreme circumstances,
receive the smallpox vaccine.
Chronic eczema -- as opposed to allergic contact
eczema, the kind you can get from poison ivyand other
irritants -- is a hereditary disorder that affects as
many as 27 million Americans, according to the Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Formally known
as atopic dermatitis, its hallmark is red, scaly, itchy
rashes, often found in the creases of the neck, elbows,
wrists and knees. Children with eczema sometimes scratch
so much that the areas start bleeding and become
infected. The constant itch can also keep them up at
night, leaving them inflamed bundles of irritability. "I
don't like that God made me so sensitive!" my 6-year-old
daughter, Sara, will wail.
Though I, too, had eczema as a child, Sara's is
much worse. The red patches cropped up behind her knees
when she was a toddler; now they can also be found on
her wrists and inside her elbows, even at times on her
neck, ears and back. The inflammation seems to flare up
with every change of season. Summertime, with the added
irritation of chlorine from the pool, can be brutal. We
fervently hope that she will be among the 40 percent of
children with eczema who appear to outgrow the disorder
by young adulthood.
Meanwhile, there is no cure for the condition --
which seems to be caused by an overreaction of the
body's immune system -- and no surefire way to head off
a flare-up, though a recent study from Great Britain
indicates that applying a topical corticosteriod twice
weekly to healed areas can help reduce relapses. That
makes for frustration all around, for doctors and
parents up against a sneaky opponent; for itchy, scabby,
self-conscious children; and for lifelong victims of the
condition.
"You can certainly minimize the triggers, but you
can never completely remove [them]," said Carol
Greenspun, a North Potomac mother of four who has had
eczema since she was in second grade and who has a son
with the disorder.
Though no one is sure why, incidence of eczema --
as well as other atopic disorders such as asthma, hay
fever and peanut allergy -- appears to be rising.
According to recent studies from Denmark, Germany,
Sweden and the United States, up to 17 percent of
schoolchildren have eczema -- about three times as many
as in earlier generations. "There's better data for the
asthma, but [eczema is] following the same direction,
with a significant increase over the last few years,"
said Alan Moshell, a skin diseases specialist with the
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and
Skin Diseases.
Possible explanations for the increase range from
too little exposure to antigens (because our houses are
too clean) to too much exposure to dust mites (because
our houses are too warm and well-insulated). There's
also the possibility that the jump in numbers may
reflect better tracking of the condition.
Whatever the case, clearly there are many parents
out there struggling with many of the same issues that I
am.
No Miracles Yet
Until recently, the most effective treatments -- other
than reducing use of soap and water (they dry the skin)
and staying away from irritants such as wool -- were
creams and ointments containing steroids. But while
steroids suppress inflammation, they do so in
sledgehammer fashion, with potentially serious side
effects. Steroids can thin the skin, changing its look
and texture, and making it more vulnerable to flare-ups.
The skin also may get used to steroids, so when the
medication is stopped and inflammation recurs, it
rebounds more dramatically. "It's a vicious cycle that
keeps getting worse," said Moshell.
Continued use of steroids can have other cosmetic
effects, including enlarged blood vessels and
pigmentation changes -- an issue for my golden-skinned
daughter, whose inner elbows and knees lightened when
our family physician put her on a steroid that was too
powerful. In the worst-case scenarios, strong steroids
used over large body surface areas may be absorbed into
the bloodstream and affect a child's growth.
Amy Paller, head of dermatology at Children's
Memorial Hospital in Chicago, said concern about such
side effects "has led to a hesitancy on the part of
parents to use medication, even resulting in poor
control of dermatitis."
So it was welcome news when the U.S. Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) approved two alternatives to
topical steroids, first Protopic (tacrolimus), an
ointment, in December 2000 and then Elidel
(pimecrolimus), a cream, in December 2001. Both are
topical immunomodulators (TIMs) -- drugs that affect
only the skin's immune cells, rather than all skin cells
-- and are in the same category of drugs that help
transplant patients fight rejection of new organs. The
new prescription drugs seem to have fewer side effects,
and unlike steroids, are safe to use on the face and
near the eyes, though they tend to take longer to work
and are more expensive. (A 30-gram tube of Protopic
costs $55.99 at drugstore.com and 30 grams of Elidel
costs $52.99, compared with $31.99 for the same amount
of Cutivate, a prescription steroid.) "Nothing works for
everybody," Moshell said. "But in the long run, because
of the side effects, most people right now would rather
control atopic eczema with immunomodulators, if
possible."
Guy Webster, professor and vice chairman of
dermatology at Jefferson Medical College in
Philadelphia, estimates that nine out of 10 of his
eczema patients are on TIMs. "I'm happy to not use
steroids," he said. Paul Kravitz, head of dermatology at
Inova Fairfax Hospital, cautions that the new drugs are
not panaceas; he often prescribes them in combination
with older treatments.
Some patients have already experienced problems.
"The Protopic was helping, but the side effects -- the
burning, the tingling -- was too much for me," said
Greenspun, who recently switched to Elidel. She finds
the Elidel less effective but more tolerable, she said.
While my husband and I were eager to have Sara try
a non-steroidal drug, our experience has been mixed. To
our disappointment, Elidel didn't help Sara much at all.
She's had more luck with a regimen that alternates
Protopic with a prescription steroid; the combination
seems to be slowly relieving her latest outbreak, which
was quite severe. Because the new drugs can take longer
to work, we are all trying to be patient, but it is
tempting to think about the "good old days" when the
strong topical steroid we used cleared her right up. In
some ways, ignorance is bliss.
Smallpox 'What If's
That's definitely the case when it comes to the smallpox
vaccine -- a scary subject for eczema patients and
parents of children with the condition, though recently
released studies of vaccinated military personnel offer
some comfort. Experts have warned all those with eczema
or a history of eczema or any skin disorder to avoid
getting the vaccine prophylactically because they are at
risk for a serious complication called eczema
vaccinatum, in which the smallpox vaccine replicates at
the puncture site and spreads lesions to other parts of
the body. According to U.S. studies from 1968, during
the mass inoculation program before smallpox was
eradicated, 10 to 40 cases of this potentially fatal
complication occurred per million people receiving the
vaccine for the first time. That, say experts, raises
eczema patients' risks of complication from the vaccine
beyond those for exposure to smallpox -- at least for
now, when any threat from smallpox is only theoretical.
The CDC is "being very cautious," said Joanne Cono,
medical epidemiologist with the agency's Bioterrorism
Preparedness and Response Program. "There's no
circulating smallpox. We don't want to cause more injury
with the vaccine than the good we do," she added.
Should a smallpox attack occur, however, the
advice changes. Then, the risk posed by the disease
would outweigh the risk of vaccine complications, and
vaccination is advised within four days of exposure.
"Even persons with a risk factor, if they have been
exposed to a case of smallpox, they'll be advised to get
the vaccine," Cono said. The same advice holds true,
says the CDC, for those exposed to monkeypox. The advice
gets more complicated, though. Not only should eczema
patients avoid preventive vaccinations; experts say they
should avoid close physical contact with anyone who has
recently received the vaccine. Because the smallpox
vaccine is a live virus, it can be spread until the
vaccination site heals and the scab falls off, in about
three weeks. Though inadvertent inoculation could occur
in any setting in which some people have been vaccinated
while others have not, experts say it is more likely to
occur among people in close contact, such as those
living in the same household.
So what about those military personnel who were
vaccinated? According to studies recently published in
the Journal of the American Medical Association,
thorough screening for skin diseases has resulted in no
reported cases of eczema vaccinatum in more than 450,000
military personnel vaccinated from December through May.
There were, however, 21 cases of contact vaccinia --
cases of the virus in the vaccine spread by vaccinated
service members to unvaccinated spouses, children,
friends and others. And there was also a more unexpected
complication: 37 of those vaccinated suffered heart
inflammation. Based on this, a panel of medical experts
advised the CDC against expanding the immunization
campaign for first responders. Of course, the whole
smallpox inoculation business makes for frightening
scenarios for fretful parents.
During the first Code Orange alert last fall, my
husband and I had anxious late-night discussions about
what we'd do with our children if the vaccine were
recommended for Washington area residents. We settled on
taking turns getting vaccinated. (Although my eczema
history should disqualify me, I was vaccinated as a
child with no ill effects and wouldn't hesitate to be
vaccinated again.) One parent would live elsewhere with
our older daughter, Rachel, who does not have eczema.
Then that parent and Rachel would return and the other
parent would live elsewhere for a few weeks after
receiving the vaccine.
Maybe this sounds like a bit of paranoia, but it
feels better to have a plan. Still, we wondered: Would
it be enough to keep our vaccinated selves away from
Sara? Would we also have to keep her home from school,
to prevent her from coming into contact with children
who have gotten the vaccine and who might not be
cautious about covering their vaccination sites?
I've broached these fears to dermatologists and to
the CDC. I haven't gotten any definitive answers,
perhaps because there are none.
Children were not quarantined during the previous
vaccination program, notes the CDC's Cono, who thinks it
"unlikely" that parents would be urged to keep young
eczema patients home from school. "But it's all
speculation," she said. "The policies haven't been
developed." With the government behind in its smallpox
inoculation goals -- of the nearly 500,000 health care
workers and up to 10 million emergency responders who
Bush advisers targeted for immunization by summer, fewer
than 40,000 have been vaccinated -- it's unclear when --
or if -- such guidelines might be completed.
Concern about exposing vulnerable patients to a
vaccinated individual worries some health care
providers, too. "It's even been an issue for us," said
dermatologist Paller. "We as doctors are first-line
responders. Every day I see kids with eczema." One
encouraging sign: In the recently completed military
studies, not one of the more than 27,000 vaccinated
health care workers transmitted the vaccine virus to a
patient.
But the risk is still real, and so is the worry it
causes. The best thing for parents at this point is to
"be aware," said Paller. "Hopefully there's nothing
anyone will ever need to do." That's true. But. like
most everything associated with eczema, it's not very
comforting.
Resources
The American Academy of Dermatology hosts a site on
the World Wide Web,
www.skincarephysicians.com/eczemanet, that provides
news and information to eczema patients and their
families. The academy's main Web site,
www.aad.org, has a
section called "Kids' Connection" that discusses eczema.
847-330-0230.
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention provides updates and information on smallpox
vaccination at www.cdc.gov.
DISCLAIMER:
All information, data, and material contained, presented, or provided here
is for general information purposes only and is not to be construed as
reflecting the knowledge or opinions of the publisher, and is not to be
construed or intended as providing medical or legal advice. The decision
whether or not to vaccinate is an important and complex issue and should
be made by you, and you alone, in consultation with your health care
provider.
"A foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth."
-- Albert Einstein, letter to a friend, 1901
"I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves, and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education."
-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to William C. Jarvis, September 28, 1820
"What's the point of vaccination if it doesn't protect you from the unvaccinated?"
-- Sandy Gottstein
"Who gets to decide what the greater good is and how many will be sacrificed to it?"