Return to Vaccination News Home Page  __»   Right-click to "open in new window"

Subscribe to the Vaccination NewsLetter

View past & current Scandals (columns by Sandy Mintz)

Search This Site using keywords

http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/content/abstract/112/1/e6

Pediatrics Track your favorites with CiteTrack
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Browse & Search]


Full Text of this Article
Reprint (PDF) Version of this Article
Email this article to a friend
P3Rs: Submit a response to this article
Similar articles found in:
Pediatrics Online
PubMed
PubMed Citation
Search PubMed for articles by:
Iwamoto, M. || Pickering, L. K.
Alert me when:
new articles cite this article
 
Download to Citation Manager
Collections under which this article appears:
Infectious Disease & Immunity
 
Related AAP Red Book topics:
    Rotavirus Infections
 


PEDIATRICS Vol. 112 No. 1 July 2003, pp. e6-e10

 


ELECTRONIC ARTICLE

A Survey of Pediatricians on the Reintroduction of a Rotavirus Vaccine

Martha Iwamoto, MD, MPH*, Thomas N. Saari, MD{ddagger}, Shawn R. McMahon, MD, MPH§, Hussain R. Yusuf, MBBS, MPH§, Mehran S. Massoudi, PhD, MPH§, John M. Stevenson, MA§, Susan Y. Chu, PhD, MSPH§ and Larry K. Pickering, MD§

 

* Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
{ddagger} University of Wisconsin Children’s Hospital, Madison, Wisconsin
§ National Immunization Program, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia

Objective. Rhesus-based rotavirus tetravalent vaccine (RRV-TV; RotaShield) was withdrawn voluntarily from the market in October 1999, and recommendations for use were suspended. Rotavirus infection continues to be a significant health problem affecting children worldwide. The objective of this study was to investigate whether pediatricians would either reconsider using RRV-TV or consider other, newer, and presumably safer rotavirus vaccines if they were recommended routinely and to determine factors that influence their opinion.

Methods. A questionnaire was sent to a random sample of 250 members of the Wisconsin Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and to 437 randomly selected members of the Georgia Chapter of the AAP. Nonresponders received reminder questionnaires.

Results. Of the 687 pediatricians surveyed, 384 (56%) responded. Responses from 319 eligible immunization providers were included in the final analysis. Although only 15% of respondents reported that they would give RRV-TV if it were available today, 94% reported that they would use a new rotavirus vaccine if proved to be safer than RRV-TV and if recommended by the AAP and Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices for routine use among infants. Barriers to reintroducing a rotavirus vaccine were fear of adverse reactions among 95% of pediatricians, followed by potential high vaccine cost (63%) and amount of time required to educate parents (57%).

Conclusions. Pediatricians reported that they would use a rotavirus vaccine if it was safer than RRV-TV and routinely recommended by the AAP and the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices.

 


Key Words: rotavirus • rotavirus vaccine • RRV-TV

 

Abbreviations: RRV-TV, rhesus-based rotavirus tetravalent vaccine • AAP, American Academy of Pediatrics • ACIP, Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices

 


Received for publication Jun 13, 2002; accepted Mar 13, 2003.





 

 

[For Subscribers]
Copyright © 2003 by the American Academy of Pediatrics. [Disclaimer]

 

Return to Vaccination News Home Page  __»   Right-click to "open in new window"

DISCLAIMER:    All information, data, and material contained, presented, or provided here is for general information purposes only and is not to be construed as reflecting the knowledge or opinions of the publisher, and is not to be construed or intended as providing medical or legal advice.  The decision whether or not to vaccinate is an important and complex issue and should be made by you, and you alone, in consultation with your health care provider.