Report calls for better evaluation of pharmcogenetic tests
Ray Moynihan Washington, DC
The marketing of pharmacogenetic tests may be moving much faster than the
underlying medical science, warns a study published this week.
"There is widespread recognition that pharmacogenetics may have been oversold
. . . The basic science is still substantially uncertain," argues its author,
David Melzer, and colleagues from the Department of Public Health and Primary
Care at the University of Cambridge. Funded by the Wellcome Trust, the studywas based on interviews and focus groups involving key experts on
pharmacogenetics and major stakeholders in the United States and the United
Kingdom.
The authors found a widespread view that genetic tests have great potential
to improve the safety and effectiveness of an individual patients drug
treatment, by guiding the choices of the most appropriate drug at the best dose
and by identifying whether they are at high risk of serious adverse reactions to
the drugs.
The report gives the pharmacogenetics associated with warfarin as an example
of a potentially useful application of the new technology, given the wide
variation in dose that is required to attain a response in different patients
and the risk of subsequent bleeding. Early evidence has shown that certain
genetic variations are associated with an impaired ability to eliminate the
drug, raising the possibility that genetic testing might help to identify more
appropriate doses for patients and reduce the occurrence of serious
complications.
"Although further studies are needed to replicate and confirm these findings,
this application of pharmacogenetics appears to be promising and potentially
near to the clinic," the report says.
The report concludes, however, that regulatory agencies should require
mandatory clinical evaluation of these genetic tests for the promise of safer
and more effective use of drugs to be realised. Criticising what they called
"geno-hype," the authors argue that "media excitement about genetic applications
may be exaggerating investment and research activity" in pharmacogenetics.
Because of this overselling, some companies may have inappropriately large
investments in the field, so "commercial interests may be under pressure to
market test-drug combinations as quickly as possible, to the detriment of good
clinical evaluation of products."
The new report follows the launch last month by the Swiss drugs company Roche
of a new diagnostic test designed to identify common genetic variations that
effect peoples ability to metabolise widely used classes of drugs. The launch
of the product, AmpliChip CYP450, received enthusiastic media coverage and led
to excited estimates of a burgeoning market for pharmacogenetic products. A
Roche press release predicted an annual market of $100m (£60m; 87m) by 2008 for
this one test alone.
DISCLAIMER:
All information, data, and material contained, presented, or provided here
is for general information purposes only and is not to be construed as
reflecting the knowledge or opinions of the publisher, and is not to be
construed or intended as providing medical or legal advice. The decision
whether or not to vaccinate is an important and complex issue and should
be made by you, and you alone, in consultation with your health care
provider.
"A foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth."
-- Albert Einstein, letter to a friend, 1901
"I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves, and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education."
-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to William C. Jarvis, September 28, 1820
"What's the point of vaccination if it doesn't protect you from the unvaccinated?"
-- Sandy Gottstein
"Who gets to decide what the greater good is and how many will be sacrificed to it?"