Study sheds light on how the sun causes skin cancer
Findings could lead to new methods for diagnosing early
melanoma
BOSTON Researchers at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute have made a discovery
that could help solve a mystery in cancer biology: how a sunburn acquired during
a childhood day at the beach can develop into a deadly tumor decades later. The
scientists report in the Feb. 4 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
that the sun's damaging ultraviolet (UV) rays target a series of biochemical
signals inside the young skin cell, impairing the cell's ability to control its
proliferation. The paper currently is available on the journal's web site.
Lynda Chin, MD, and her colleagues found that they could increase both the
number of tumors and the speed with which they formed by exposing newborn mice
with an intact Rb pathway to UV radiation. (A pathway is a chain of biochemical
signals that regulates cellular activity.) Those mice in which the Rb pathway
was already essentially knocked out were unaffected by the dose of UV radiation.
"It looks like the Rb pathway is specifically targeted by ultraviolet
radiation," said Chin, the study's senior author. Karupiah Kannan, PhD, and
Norman Sharpless, MD, formerly at the DFCI, are first authors on the study.
Melanoma is the deadliest form of skin cancer and, left unchecked, can spread
aggressively to other parts of the body. However, if caught early, many melanoma
lesions can be effectively treated surgically. The discovery that UV radiation
triggers melanoma formation by dismantling a specific pathway inside the skin's
pigment-producing cells, or melanocytes, offers the possibility of an efficient
means of distinguishing, at an early stage, cancerous moles from non-cancerous
ones.
"If you see in a sun-induced lesion that its Rb pathway has been inactivated,
then the risk of it becoming a melanoma is much greater than one without such a
lesion," said Chin, who is also an assistant professor of dermatology at Harvard
Medical School. "You could then use that as a prognostic factor to determine
which of these funny-looking moles needs to be cut out with a wide margin around
it,"
Though there were hints that it might be particularly susceptible to
environmental attack, the discovery that the Rb pathway is specifically targeted
by UV radiation is surprising for several reasons. To begin, UV radiation was
thought to be a less picky carcinogenic agent, targeting multiple pathways in
the cell. When it hit, it was thought to do so in the manner of a surgical
strike, causing a point mutation. Yet when Chin and her colleagues explored the
DNA in the tumors of the UV-affected mice they found a more massive disruption.
A whole region of chromosome 5 appeared to be expanded, or amplified, suggesting
that the UV radiation had actually caused the double stranded DNA molecule to
break.
"Given the data we see, people need to think of amplification, and also
deletion, presumably, as a mechanism by which UV exerts its mutagenic effects,"
Chin said. "So far people haven't really looked at these as UV-induced changes."
Perhaps most significant, the findings suggest that Rb may be a kind of
molecular dark horse in the human melanoma story. Human melanomas are known to
exhibit defects in their Rb pathway, but they also exhibit mutations in other
pathways such as p53 pathways. Mutation of both Rb and p53 pathways are needed
for a tumor to emerge. Based on genetic studies in mice, many thought the p53
mutations were more important than the Rb mutations. Opinion began to shift a
little over a year ago, when Sharpless and a team of Dana-Farber researchers
reported that a mice engineered to lack only a gene in the Rb pathway, p16,
developed tumors at a faster rate when exposed to carcinogenic chemicals.
Prompted by the findings, the researchers suggested that the normal function of
the Rb pathway might be to tell the cell to stop dividing in the presence of
environmentally induced damage.
To explore this hypothesis, and to compare more generally the role of the Rb
and p53 pathways in melanoma, Chin and her colleagues exposed newborns of two
strains of genetically-engineered mice--one lacking a critical component of the
p53 pathway, p19, and one lacking the Rb pathway protein p16--to UV radiation.
(Both strains carried the Ras mutation, making them especially cancer-prone.)
The p19 mutants, whose Rb pathway was intact and therefore vulnerable to attack,
had a much higher chance of developing melanomas when exposed to UV
radiation--85 percent compared to 50 percent in unexposed litters. They also
developed more tumors, two to three compared to one in the non-exposed group.
And the lesions appeared, on average, six weeks sooner.
The p16 mutants, whose Rb pathway was already defective and therefore
impervious to additional UV insult, exhibited no such difference. Their chance
of developing tumors was the same whether or not they were exposed to UV
radiation even though their p53 pathway was theoretically susceptible to attack
by UV radiation.
Puzzled as to where in the Rb pathway the UV agent was aiming its blows, the
researchers compared both the DNA and the gene expression patterns of melanomas
from the UV radiation-exposed p19 knockouts to the unexposed mice, which
presumably developed their tumors spontaneously. While loss of p16 function
showed up in the expression patterns of 50 percent of the unexposed mice tumors,
it appeared in only 20 percent of exposed mutants. Upon further examination,
they found another gene, cdk6, was overexpressed and amplified in the vast
majority of the UV-induced tumors. In a remarkable convergence, the
investigators realized that cdk6 resides on chromosome 5 within the precise
region that the investigators also noted to be amplified when the tumors were
examined in a genome-wide manner. These functional and genetic data suggest that
cdk6, and thereby the Rb pathway, is the UV target in this model.
Why this gene, which was not turned on in any of the spontaneously developing
mouse tumors, should be especially vulnerable to UV perturbation is not clear.
Nor is the cdk6 gene UV radiation's only likely target. Though it was
overexpressed in the majority of the UV exposed tumors, many lesions exhibited
as yet unknown defects. "The data suggest that UV is really targeting the Rb
pathway rather than specific components," said Chin. Such a single-minded
strategy would make sense if the Rb pathway were the cell's main environmental
carcinogen sensor, she added.
Turning the findings into a tool for diagnosing human melanomas will require
more basic research. "People have not thought to correlate Rb status with sun
exposure history and progression of pigmented lesions," Chin said. "It is not an
easy study to do but at least now someone can formulate a hypothesis and design
a study to answer that question."
###
The study was funded in part by the National Institutes of Health, the
Claudia Adams Barr Program in Cancer Research and the Rockefeller Brothers Fund.
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute is a principal teaching affiliate of the Harvard
Medical School and is among the leading cancer research and care centers in the
United States. It is a founding member of the Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center
(DF/HCC), designated a comprehensive cancer center by the National Cancer
Institute.
ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND
MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION
PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS
OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR
LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND
COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH
YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.
"A foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth."
-- Albert Einstein, letter to a friend, 1901
"I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves, and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education."
-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to William C. Jarvis, September 28, 1820
"What's the point of vaccination if it doesn't protect you from the unvaccinated?"
-- Sandy Gottstein
"Who gets to decide what the greater good is and how many will be sacrificed to it?"