| Wednesday, January 08, 2003
- Nine of Colorado's 12 largest hospitals may not send health care workers
to get the smallpox vaccine, while other institutions statewide are scaling
back participation because of safety and liability concerns.
 |
| Post / Brian Brainerd |
| Dr. Frank Judson, Director of Denver
Public Health will administer the smallpox vaccinations in Denver
should the order be given. |
|
| |
Colorado initially planned to vaccinate 1,400 health workers as part of a
federal program meant to get the nation ready in case of a bioterrorism
attack involving smallpox.
But just two weeks before the vaccine should arrive in Colorado,
hospitals of all sizes, including the 10-hospital Centura chain, Children's
Hospital, St. Joseph, Presbyterian St. Luke's in Denver and St. Mary's in
Grand Junction, say they still are not sure they will send anyone to be
vaccinated.
"My reluctance is what happens if it goes all wrong?" asked Fort Collins
paramedic Lyle Huff, 49. "What if I'm the one who dies? Who would take care
of my family? The answers have not been very forthcoming."
At Poudre Valley Hospital in Fort Collins, administrators told state
health officials a month ago they would send 150 people to get the shots.
Now, the hospital expects to send 12.
Nine people will receive the vaccine at Denver Health Medical Center.
University Hospital will likely inoculate between 15 and 20. Neither
hospital would say how many people they had planned to send.
"When they read through all the caveats and concerns about compensation
and the vaccine, the numbers have dropped," said Dr. Ted Eickhoff, medical
director of infection control at University Hospital. "People are
increasingly concerned about the safety."
About 15 in a million people who get the vaccine will become gravely ill.
But many health care workers worry the contagious scab the shot creates will
pose risks to their families and patients.
And so far, no one has promised to take responsibility for health care
workers, their patients or family members if they become sick from the
vaccine.
Nationally, at least two hospitals posted policies refusing to inoculate
employees because there was no known credible risk of the deadly disease.
Dr. Mark Edmond at Virginia Commonwealth University Hospital in Richmond
said he didn't think the risk of transmitting vaccinia, a contagious illness
contracted from the smallpox vaccine, to patients was worth it.
"We have a lot of HIV patients, and we have a lot of really sick people
in this hospital," Edmond said. "It could be very bad."
Absent an actual case of smallpox in the world, hospital administrators
are unsure about putting their employees through the health risks of the
vaccine.
"We're not just going to come out and say, 'Yeah, we'll do it,"' said
Laura Weigsheid, spokeswoman for Centura Health. "It doesn't seem clear if
the benefits in the case of an unknown threat outweigh the risks."
Centura, which includes St. Anthony Central, the state's largest
hospital, is looking into what its workers' compensation plan would cover
and how doctors and nurses feel about the vaccine's potential drawbacks,
Weigsheid said. A decision should be made this week.
Dr. Frank Judson, director of the Denver health department, plans to get
the vaccine, but he said he understands why many people are hesitant.
"If this vaccine causes me harm, who is liable for my medical care, my
lost work, my long-term rehabilitation or death?" he asked. "I think that
will turn a lot of people off when it comes down to doing it."
As hospitals and health workers discuss the nuances of the federal plan,
announced by President Bush and Secretary of Health and Human Services Tommy
Thompson on Dec. 13, government agencies are trying to find solutions.
Officials with the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention say
they have not decided whether to set up a victims' compensation fund or
whether the federal government will shoulder the cost for health care
workers and their families and patients, should they get sick.
"Discussions are ongoing every day. I think eventually there will be a
decision made," said Von Roebuck, a CDC spokesman.
At the state health department, Dr. Ned Calonge is waiting until
vaccination day, which could be as early as Jan. 24, to see how many doctors
and nurses will actually come down to a designated smallpox vaccination
site, sign the consent waiver and get the shot.
"I don't know how many we'll end up with," said Calonge, acting medical
director for the state. "Unless we get some of these issues worked out, I
think the number of people who initially said they will get it will drop
significantly."
State labor officials are trying to figure out how workers' compensation
would cover vaccine-related illness because the federal smallpox program
with health care workers is voluntary, said MaryAnn Whiteside, director of
the division of workers' compensation at the state's Department of Labor and
Employment.
Usually, for insurers to cover an injured or sick employee, the person
has to be engaged in work that was required of them - not voluntary like the
smallpox vaccine.
Because few people across the country have yet to figure this all out,
hospital lobbying groups have asked the federal government for help, said
James Bentley, senior vice president of the American Hospital Association.
"We have been pushing and pushing as politely and as vigorously as we
can," he said. "If the president and the government really feel like this is
essential, why don't they address a compensation fund?"
Illness aside, hospitals feel they are in a tough position because of
liability. Administrators say they worry about getting named in a lawsuit
should a patient or a health care worker's family member get sick from the
vaccine.
But a federal government technicality to be decided Jan. 24 could save
them from that blame.
That day, when the Homeland Security Act takes effect, hospitals and
states could be immune from potential lawsuits if the Department of Health
and Human Services designates the smallpox vaccinations as a "federal
emergency," according to state health officials.
The inoculations already have been given to members of the military. It
is the same vaccine that was given in the 1960s and 1970s, but there are
more problems with the population now, which makes the vaccine's risks more
perilous, Edmond said.
AIDS wasn't around 40 years ago; neither were patients on
immune-suppressing drugs used to treat people with rheumatoid arthritis and
those who have received donated organs. People with eczema also should not
get the vaccine, and incidence of that skin disease is up sevenfold, health
officials say.
|