Military Says It Can't Make Enough Vaccines for Troops
By ERIC SCHMITT
ASHINGTON,
Jan. 8 One of the Army's top biodefense officers said today that the Pentagon
does not have vaccines to protect troops from some virulent biological agents
because it has not been able to offer enough money to commercial pharmaceutical
companies to produce them.
The officer, Col. Erik A. Henchal, said the Army laboratory that he commands
at Fort Detrick, Md., has developed 20 vaccines for various deadly agents. But
most are sitting on the shelf, he said, because the Pentagon has not been able
to attract interest from pharmaceutical companies, which see little commercial
value in them.
Under normal circumstances, Pentagon researchers develop a drug or vaccine to
a certain point, then license it to a commercial company for production. In the
case of some biological agents, the demand for vaccines has not been sufficient
to prod commercial drug companies to produce them on a large scale for civilian
use.
In a wide-ranging interview, Colonel Henchal, who took command of the United
States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases last June, also
said that ports, airports and other logistical hubs could be prime terrorist
targets for sowing panic among civilians, unleashing an international epidemic
or disrupting military preparations in the Persian Gulf.
Until recently, Colonel Henchal said, the relatively small number of vaccine
dosages the Pentagon would require for service members has discouraged
commercial interest in developing such products for the military. He said new
financing methods or perhaps a production facility dedicated to military use
might be needed.
Moreover, delays of two to five years to obtain approval from the Food and
Drug Administration only compounded the problem. "It's been difficult to get
vaccines into production," the colonel said.
Even as the administration has prepared a plan to protect the nation against
smallpox, Colonel Henchal said, the country and its armed forces remain
vulnerable. "There are holes in a list of agents we think of as classical
biological threats," he told reporters at a breakfast meeting. "We've been
trying to fill those holes."
In some cases where vaccines are lacking, the colonel said, antibiotics can
treat an infection if administered soon after exposure. But not all agents can
be treated with antibiotics, he added.
Colonel Henchal spoke candidly for an hour about bioterror threats and
vulnerabilities that many civilian policymakers have discussed in more muted
terms, presumably to avoid raising public alarm.
For example, he said, releasing smallpox in the Frankfurt International
Airport in Germany, with hundreds of thousands of travelers, "could create a
worldwide epidemic of smallpox pretty quickly."
He also said terrorists would most likely use airplanes, boats or even cars
equipped with foggers or sprayers, like those on crop dusters, to disperse
biological agents.
The colonel's command is responsible for researching vaccines, therapeutic
drugs and information about biological agents. It does not have primary
responsibility for developing protective gear worn by troops or sensors designed
to detect agents.
The military, he said, is still going through growing pains in consolidating
and coordinating all the disparate units that have responsibility for dealing
with terrorist attacks.
Last year, the Pentagon established a new Northern Command in Colorado to
oversee the military's response to homeland security matters. Colonel Henchal
said "connections were still being made" between the Army lab and the new
military headquarters, which he said was in many ways still a "virtual command."
Asked to rank the most serious biological threats to American troops, Colonel
Henchal said anthrax and smallpox were at the top. But because the United States
is taking steps to inoculate its troops and civilian populations or has
effective antibiotics against some germs, he said, terrorists may pursue other
agents.
The British authorities found a small quantity of the deadly toxin ricin
during an antiterrorist sweep in London over the weekend. Colonel Henchal said
ricin is an effective agent against individual targets but would be less
effective in a major attack because large quantities of the agent would be
required.
Botulinum, a toxin that leads to paralysis and respiratory failure, is a
serious threat because it is fast-acting and difficult to detect in the body, he
said, noting that Iraq had the ability to produce the agent. When asked how
large a hole there is in America's defenses against botulinum, he said, "I think
it's pretty serious."
The Army lab has developed seven vaccines for various strains of botulinum,
but the high cost of producing them has stalled their production, Colonel
Henchal said. "They don't fit people's business models," he said.
Citing pharmaceutical industry figures, he said it costs $600 million to
bring a new vaccine to market. By comparison, the Army lab's annual budget is
about $50 million, he said.
Colonel Henchal said the military had improved its ability to analyze
suspected agents. Portable field sensors can screen air samplings and give an
initial analysis within 15 minutes, he said. A larger Army mobile laboratory can
give a more detailed analysis within about 40 minutes. Specialists from the
mobile lab recently were sent to the Persian Gulf, he said.
The Army lab, as well as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in
Atlanta, can provide a final and definitive analysis. But Colonel Henchal said
that could take anywhere from 24 hours to 30 days, depending on the agent.
On the battlefield, Colonel Henchal said, commanders would not have detection
equipment as a part of their force. If their units came under attack from
suspected chemical or biological weapons, he said the commander's main recourse
would be to order troops to don protective equipment.
American troops are trained to operate in the hot, cumbersome protective
suits, but Colonel Henchal said the gear reduces combat effectiveness by about
30 percent. "It's just a reality," he said.
ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND
MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION
PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS
OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR
LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND
COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH
YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.
"A foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth."
-- Albert Einstein, letter to a friend, 1901
"I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves, and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education."
-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to William C. Jarvis, September 28, 1820
"What's the point of vaccination if it doesn't protect you from the unvaccinated?"
-- Sandy Gottstein
"Who gets to decide what the greater good is and how many will be sacrificed to it?"