MGH study supports protective effect of stimulant treatment
for ADHD
Meta-analysis shows medication treatment decreases risk of
future substance abuse
An analysis of all available studies that examine the possible impact of
stimulant treatment for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) on
future substance abuse supports the safety of stimulant treatment. Using a
statistical technique called meta-analysis, the researchers from Massachusetts
General Hospital (MGH) found that medication treatment for children with ADHD
resulted in an almost two-fold reduction in the risk of future substance abuse.
The report appears in the January 2003 issue of Pediatrics.
"We know that untreated individuals with ADHD are at a significantly
increased risk for substance abuse. And we understand why parents often ask
whether stimulant medications might lead to future substance abuse among their
children," says Timothy Wilens, MD, MGH director of Substance Abuse Services in
Pediatric Psychopharmacology, the paper?s lead author. "Now we can reassure
parents and other practitioners that treating ADHD actually protects children
against alcohol and drug abuse as well as other future problems."
Wilens and his MGH colleagues have conducted previous studies that found a
protective effect in stimulant treatment. However, at least one report from
another research center asserted that stimulant treatment increased the risk of
later substance abuse. In order to resolve the question, Wilens' group searched
the medical literature for studies of children, adolescents and adults with ADHD
that included followup information on later substance abuse. They identified six
such studies conducted in the U.S. and Germany, which provided information on
more than a thousand participants with ADHD -- 674 who received stimulant
treatment and 360 who were non-medicated -- followed for four years or more.
These studies included both the previous MGH research and the study suggesting
increased risk.
After application of standard meta-analysis techniques, the researchers found
a significant overall reduction in the risk of subsequent substance abuse among
those receiving stimulant treatment. They note that four of the six studies
showed "striking protective effects of stimulant medications."
Of the other two studies, one did not find significant differences in
substance abuse between the treated and untreated groups. Regarding the study
that suggested an increased risk, the MGH researchers noted that participants
who received stimulant treatment in that study had more problems before they
began treatment, particularly a greater incidence of conduct disorder (juvenile
delinquency). Since conduct disorder is a recognized and very strong risk factor
for substance abuse, it is unclear whether the conduct disorder or the
medication actually resulted in the increased substance abuse risk.
The MGH team also noted that the protective effect of stimulant treatment for
ADHD in childhood was not as strong in young adults as it was in adolescents.
While some of this could relate to the fact that adolescents are still subject
to parental supervision, the researchers also suggest that past recommendations
that stimulant treatment be discontinued in adolescence could cause the
protective effect to disappear in subsequent years.
"From a public health level," Wilens says, "these results finding protection
against later substance abuse -- which is one of the most malevolent problems
facing adolescents and young adults -- are among the strongest in child
psychiatry. Moreover, these findings add to the growing literature supporting
the long-term safety of stimulants and other medications for treatment of ADHD."
Wilens and colleagues are continuing to study the biological and
psychological mechanisms by which ADHD increases the risk for substance abuse in
young people and why treatment decreases the ultimate risk.
###
Wilens' coauthors are Stephen Farone, PhD; Joseph Biederman, MD, and Samantha
Gunawardene, all of the MGH Pediatric Psychopharmacology Unit. The study was
entirely supported by grants from the National Institute on Drug Abuse.
The Massachusetts General Hospital, established in 1811, is the original and
largest teaching hospital of Harvard Medical School. The MGH conducts the
largest hospital-based research program in the United States, with an annual
research budget of almost $300 million and major research centers in AIDS, the
neurosciences, cardiovascular research, cancer, cutaneous biology,
transplantation biology and photomedicine. In 1994, the MGH joined with Brigham
and Women's Hospital to form Partners HealthCare System, an integrated health
care delivery system comprising the two academic medical centers, specialty and
community hospitals, a network of physician groups and nonacute and home health
services.
ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND
MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION
PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS
OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR
LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND
COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH
YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.
"A foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth."
-- Albert Einstein, letter to a friend, 1901
"I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves, and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education."
-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to William C. Jarvis, September 28, 1820
"What's the point of vaccination if it doesn't protect you from the unvaccinated?"
-- Sandy Gottstein
"Who gets to decide what the greater good is and how many will be sacrificed to it?"