Eight-year-old Will Redwood is
autistic, but he began life as a healthy baby. At his one-year
checkup, he was walking, waving "bye-bye" and even talking
some. The doctor said he was doing fine.
A few months later, Will's
parents became concerned when their toddler changed. He
stopped talking. He didn't make eye contact, smile or wave
good-bye. Doctors said he no longer was developing normally,
but couldn't explain why.
Lyn Redwood began her own
investigation and found a frightening fact. Her son had been
exposed to high levels of mercury - a heavy metal know to
cause brain damage - as a baby. In fact, Will had received 125
times the allowable limit. The source? Routine shots
containing Thimerosal, a mercury-based preservative that was
removed from childhood vaccines in 1999.
The Redwoods concluded that
mercury poisoning caused their son's illness. They went to
court seeking help with medical bills and the cost of caring
for someone with autism, which can total millions.
And the Redwoods are not
alone. The number of autistic children skyrocketed in the
1990s, statistics show, and many parents and medical experts
believe Thimerosal is to blame. Hundreds of lawsuits have been
filed against vaccine and Thimerosal makers.
There's evidence that the
company that invented Thimerosal, the giant drug maker Eli
Lilly, knew its product might be dangerous as early as the
1930s, according to lawyers who represent some of the
families. Documents recently uncovered in the pre-trial phase
also show that Lilly's own medical department insisted on
having "non-toxic" removed from Thimerosal's label in 1967.
But a jury probably never will
hear this evidence. The Redwoods and other families are likely
never to get their day in court. The reason? The bill creating
the new Homeland Security Department, which Congress passed in
November 2002.
Although no one disputes that
Thimerosal and homeland security are completely unrelated, the
bill included a section designed to wipe out all pending
Thimerosal lawsuits. The Redwoods were shocked to hear their
legal rights had disappeared. They were even more outraged to
learn that the section protecting Eli Lilly was mysteriously
and secretly added to the bill at the last minute.
"Our children have been
silenced by autism and now the votes of Congress have silenced
them again," Lyn Redwood said. "It's a sad state of affairs
when a pharmaceutical giant is benefitted at the expense of
injured children and families whose lives have been shattered
by corporate wrongdoing."
Critics of the Lilly
provision, including members of Congress from both parties,
point out that the drug maker has close ties to Republican
leaders in Washington, including President George W. Bush. The
company has given millions to congressional campaigns, the
vast majority to Republican candidates.
Among other White House
connections, President Bush appointed Lilly's chairman to the
Homeland Security Advisory Council and a top administration
official worked there for 10 years. Lilly has denied being
responsible for the provision.
Supporters of the new law
point out that it allows families to re-file their cases in a
special federal vaccine court. But that's small comfort,
lawyers say, because the court provides limited compensation
and it's already too late for many families.
The federal vaccine court has
a strict deadline for filing cases - three years from when
symptoms first appeared. In Will Redwood's case, that was
seven years ago.
More information is available
at www.safeminds.org,
the web site of Safe Minds, a group working to prevent
mercury-related injuries. Lyn Redwood is the group's
president.