EVERLY
HILLS, Calif.
The new year started with a medical crisis that could spread. Surgeons at four
West Virginia hospitals began their walkout on New Year's Day, in protest of
malpractice insurance costs. Many operations were canceled, and some patients
had to be moved out of state for treatment. In Pennsylvania, a similar walkout
was only narrowly averted after an 11th-hour intervention by the governor.
The problem with medical malpractice is severe. A recent report by the
Institute of Medicine estimates that at least 44,000 and as many as 98,000
hospitalized Americans die every year as a result of medical errors. Those
figures exceed the number of people who die each year of breast cancer or in car
accidents. Clearly, the victims of medical errors and their families deserve
compensation. But resolving these cases under current tort law only hampers
medical care.
We doctors are now obsessed with the legal system. When I'm in the surgeons'
lounge at my hospital, I don't feel like a doctor, given all of the legal jargon
flying back and forth among my colleagues. Instead, it feels as if I'm in some
sort of lawyers' confab. Rather than discussing medicine, we talk about which
colleagues have retired early because their malpractice premiums hit six
figures. It's the same at professional meetings. Instead of attending lectures
on the latest advances in our specialties we sign up for the ever more frequent
workshops on the finer aspects of tort law.
I went to medical school to become a doctor, not to become a moderately
knowledgeable legal hack. I don't want to practice defensive medicine, ordering
unnecessary tests out of fear of litigation. I don't want to evaluate new
patients for signs of litigiousness instead of disease. I don't want to squeeze
extra patients into my schedule just so I can pay down my malpractice premiums.
But the system is now compelling me to do all these things and I know many
of my colleagues feel the same way. In some states doctors in the more high-risk
specialities like neurosurgery and obstetrics pay as much as $200,000 a year for
malpractice insurance. I have not been sued for malpractice (yet). But my
insurance premiums increase each year anyway, forcing me to raise my rates, too.
If I'm a good doctor, why do I and you have to pay for the errors of others?
Making it more difficult to file malpractice suits and imposing caps on
excessive awards for pain and suffering, as the surgeons in West Virginia are
demanding, is a start. But this won't get to the deeper problem: Mistakes do
happen, and they have consequences, sometimes dire ones. Rather than focusing on
rewarding victims and their lawyers, we should concentrate on creating fewer
victims that means changing how we train doctors, track and correct errors and
mete out punishment.
Under the current system, catastrophe is the impetus to examining the
conditions that can lead to error. Doctors, hospitals and medical boards should
be more proactive. We should be more vigilant in enforcing laws that cap the
number of hours worked by residents. There should be a uniform system for
reporting and analyzing medical errors nationwide. Patient records should be
better coordinated while taking care to protect privacy so that doctors can
easily gain access to a patient's complete history. My mechanic has better
records on my car than I have on some of my patients. Peer review of the
day-to-day care of patients should be the first line of defense against poor
care more involved medical boards should monitor activities continuously and
not wait for serial offenders before taking action.
Of course doctors, being human, will continue to make mistakes. But everyone
would benefit in a system that encouraged doctors to be the best doctors they
can be, rather than lawyers in training.
ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND
MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION
PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS
OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR
LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND
COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH
YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.
"A foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth."
-- Albert Einstein, letter to a friend, 1901
"I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves, and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education."
-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to William C. Jarvis, September 28, 1820
"What's the point of vaccination if it doesn't protect you from the unvaccinated?"
-- Sandy Gottstein
"Who gets to decide what the greater good is and how many will be sacrificed to it?"