| Fri 7 Feb 2003 |
 |
|
| Parents can have the safer
vaccine for their children - but if they don't ask for it,
they will receive the cheaper jab containing mercury. |
|
Parents must ask to receive safer
vaccine
FRASER NELSON
DOCTORS have been told to come clean about
Infanrix, the safer whooping cough jab available on the NHS - but
only if directly challenged about it by parents.
The compromise means that parents who ask no questions will have
their children injected with the cheaper DTwP jab laced with ethyl
mercury - a substance ordered out of US medicine on health
grounds.
The deal was met with political outrage yesterday as Scotland’s
opposition parties accused the Scottish Executive of skirting
around its duty to give parents the full facts about vaccination
options before going ahead.
Dr Andrew Fraser, Scotland’s deputy chief medical officer, has
written an "urgent message" to Scottish medical specialists
alerting them to fears around thimerosal, a controversial vaccine
preservative 50 per cent composed of mercury.
The substance is contained in DTwP, the £10-a-shot jab from France
which protects against diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis, or
whooping cough, routinely given to all babies aged two, three and
four months.
Its rival is Infanrix, a UK vaccine available on the NHS to the
few parents who know to ask for it by name. It is almost twice the
price because it comes without the so-called "junk cells"
suspected of giving children fever after injection.
It is also made without thimerosal - and is the type of vaccine
routinely used in the United States, Canada, Japan, Australia and
South Korea.
"Parents are entitled to know if thimerosal is contained in the
vaccine available to them," Dr Fraser’s letter said. "They should
be aware of the reason for this - ethyl mercury is an essential
component of the most effective vaccine available to protect
children."
The Executive explained that this "entitlement" only extends to
parents who ask if they have an alternative. Those who do not will
be given the mercury vaccine.
"The DTwP is recommended, because it is more effective. So that is
the one which is given. If parents were to ask a question, for
whatever reason, they would be told everything - about the choice,
the side-effects, whatever they wanted to know."
The Scotsman revealed yesterday that babies injected with the
cheaper DTwP vaccine are ten times as likely to suffer side
effects ranging from fever to periods of unusual crying lasting
more than an hour.
In a Holyrood debate yesterday, Frank McAveety, Scotland’s deputy
health minister, admitted that Infanrix does have "lower levels of
side effects" - but said it was less effective.
"Our recommendation is that, on the balance of risk, DTwP offers
the best protection against whooping cough. Each individual or
family will have to make those choices in consultation with their
medical practitioners."
Nicola Sturgeon, the SNP’s health spokeswoman, said this is
meaningless if parents are not being told that Infanrix exists.
"Choice can only be exercised if parents have the information to
make that choice," she said. "There will be no consultation if
doctors do not pro-actively lay out the options."
Mary Scanlon, the Tories’ health spokeswoman, asked Mr McAveety to
publish the performance data for both vaccines - saying that only
this could let parents decide which is best for their children.
The thimerosal debate has swept the US, where parents are now
suing drug companies. They are fast building evidence that the
ethyl mercury induced autism in their children.
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts, a Tory peer, raised the issue in
the House of Lords on Wednesday night, calling for ministers "to
follow a long list of developed countries and remove thimerosal
from vaccines forthwith".
Thimerosal has not survived any public debate in any country. The
Scottish Executive has said it will soon publish the figures it
uses to argue that the mercury vaccine is better.
|
 |