|
- 20 February 2003 |
|
Today's
News Stories News Archive |
|||
|
|
|||||
|
Not for human consumption
19 February 2003 15:00 GMT by Alexandra Venter
Whether or not pet owners in general could contract TSEs from contact with contaminated pet food or their animal companions is an open question. UK animal feed guidelines are among the most stringent. Specified risk materials - such as brain tissue and spinal cord of cattle, sheep and goats over a certain age - may not be included in food for "any creature." The Department for Environment, Food, and Rural Affairs (DEFRA), Food Standards Agency, and veterinary associations, all participate in the regulation of pet food in the UK. North American standards for animal feed are based on the assumption that the region is BSE free. Nevertheless, US and Canadian regulations prohibit feeding ruminants many mammalian proteins. Pet food, which commonly contains the prohibited proteins, is not to be fed to ruminants. The pet-food industry in Canada is tightly self-regulated, says Steffani MacDonald, manager of the Pet Food Certification Program of the Canadian Veterinary Medical Association (CVMA). The CVMA, which considers its program to be the most rigorous in North America, only certifies products that meet specific nutritional and safety standards. These pet foods may include meat, animal by-products, and meal, a rendered product that may contain "whole animal," inclusive of hoof and horn, but minus any blood. Sergio Tolusso, Feed Program Co-ordinator with the Canadian Food Inspection Agency, doubts that traditional rendering practices would inactivate prions. Some raw materials must simply be kept out of feed altogether. Pet food manufacturers are becoming more discriminating, says Tolusso. Given the unknown risks of sheep scrapie and chronic wasting disease, Canadian rendering plants no longer accept elk, deer, or older sheep. The petfood brand Iams, which is distributed wordwide, uses ingredients graded for human consumption by the US Food and Drug Administration, a company representative told BioMedNet News. Canada and the US strictly control protein imports. In Canada, lamb meal is imported from New Zealand and Australia, which are considered scrapie-free. Pet food imports are also restricted, says Tolusso, since pet food, itself, could serve as a vector for introduction of TSEs. Safety standards regarding TSEs will no doubt continue to evolve. "The rendering industry is in a state of flux," said one veterinary expert from Western Canada. "It's an unfinished story."
|
See also:
Examining unmet needs in infectious disease [Therapeutic focus] Noel J.C. Snell This review looks at some of the key unmet needs in infectious diseases and discusses strategies to address them. Drug Discovery Today, 2003, 8:1:22-30 TSE agent strains and PrP: reconciling structure and function [Opinion] Robert A. Somerville Trends in Biochemical Sciences, 2002, 27:12:606-612 |
||||
|
Related links on other sites:
BSE - a wolf in sheep's clothing? [Opinion] Matthew Baylis, Fiona Houston, Rowland R. Kao, Angela R. McLean, Nora Hunter and Mike B. Gravenor Trends in Microbiology, 2002, 10:12:563-570 Food Standards Agency, UK. Interview. Feb. 12, 2003 UK Food Standards Agency Canadian Food Inspection Agency
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
Today's News Stories News Archive |
|||||

What, if anything, keeps pet food BSE free? Transmissible
spongiform encephalopathies (TSEs) have not been observed in dogs,
but close to 90 cases of the feline equivalent of mad cow have
been reported in UK cats since 1990. The cats probably fell ill as
a result of eating pet food containing infected beef. The owners,
according to a report published in 2001, have shown no signs of
the human equivalent of the disease, new variant Creutzfeld-Jakob
disease (vCJD).