Vaccination News Home Page                                            subscribe Vaccination NewsLetter

http://www.canada.com/health/story.html?id=%7B58F69675-3864-44CD-BF8D-C98E13D9B420%7D

'Most children' would have received Thimerosal
 
Neal Hall  
Vancouver Sun
ADVERTISEMENT

<A TARGET="_top" HREF="http://ad.ca.doubleclick.net/click%3Bh=v2|2f5a|3|0|%2a|x%3B5288289%3B0-0%3B0%3B6937688%3B9031-250|250%3B2438816|2437050|1%3B%3B%3fhttp%3a%2f%2fwww.lorealparis.ca/femmes03/en/launcher-banner-en.html"><IMG SRC="http://m.doubleclick.net/731402/lr-016_cnd-250-fem.gif" WIDTH=250 HEIGHT=250 BORDER=0></A>

Thimerosal is no longer used in routine vaccines for infants in Canada and the U.S., but at one time almost every child in B.C. received a vaccination that used the compound as a preservative.

"About 95 per cent of children received it," said Dr. John Blatherwick, chief medical health officer for the Vancouver Coastal Health Authority.

Beginning in the 1970s, he said, every child who received a mumps/measles/rubella (MMR) shot was exposed to Thimerosal.

"Most of the vaccines at one time or another had Thimerosal in them," Blatherwick said, and it is still used in MMR shots for children in Grade 6.

"It was a very good preservative," he said, adding that scientific research has not drawn a clear link that the benefits of using vaccines containing Thimerosal outweighed the risks.

"The over-all benefits of the vaccines was so overwhelming that it would be malpractice not to give them," Blatherwick said.

He suggested that the two lawsuits filed this week -- the first in B.C. to claim a causal link between Thimerosal and autism -- will have a hard time proving the cause and effect.

"The world literature says that's not true," he said, referring to the allegation that Thimerosal can be linked to causing autism.

But Vancouver lawyer David Klein, who is representing the children and their parents in the lawsuits filed this week, maintains the jury is still out on the issue.

"The science is still emerging," the lawyer said. "The science is not definitive."

He said the rates of autism have increased dramatically over the last 10 years and only in recent years have scientists looked at the possible effects of Thimerosal.

"Our position in this lawsuit is that different children have different levels of susceptibility," Klein said

That is, not every child who received vaccines with Thimerosal would suffer neurological damage or symptoms of autism.

Klein estimated that potentially hundreds of children could join the class-action lawsuits, which are similar to two filed in Ontario last year and more than 50 filed in the U.S.

"It may be in the thousands," Klein said of the potential size of the action, which has yet to be certified by a judge.

The class action defines potential members as children born on or after Jan. 1, 1980 who received vaccines containing Thimerosal at the age of two years or younger.

The three brands of hepatitis B vaccines distributed in Canada were Heptavax and Recombivax, made and distributed by the drug company Merck Frosst Canada, and Engerix B, which was made and distributed by GlaxoSmithKline Inc.

The other drug company named in the lawsuits is Aventis Pasteur, which used to be known as Connaught Laboratories. It changed its name after it was bought by Aventis in 1999, the lawsuit says.

Connaught sold and distributed the vaccines Diphtheria/whole cell Pertussis/Tetanus (DPT), Tetanus/diphtheria absorbed (Td) and Diphtheria Tetanus toxoids pediatric (DT).

© Copyright  2003 Vancouver Sun
 
 
 
Search | About Us | Contact Us | Advertising | Privacy | Terms | FAQ | Site Map | Our Cities | U.S. Cities
Copyright ©  2003 CanWest Interactive, a division of CanWest Global Communications Corp.
All rights reserved. Copyright terms & conditions

Vaccination News Home Page

ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE.  THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.