Vaccination News Home Page                                            subscribe Vaccination NewsLetter

http://ipsapp003.lwwonline.com/content/getfile/1980/102/15/abstract.htm

Previous Abstract  | Full Text  | Full Text PDF (1.03 M)  | References (94)  | Next Abstract

 

The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 2003; 22(2):164-177

Influenza diagnosis and treatment in children: a review of studies on clinically useful tests and antiviral treatment for influenza

TIMOTHY M. UYEKI, MD, MPH, MPP
EDITED BY LARRY K. PICKERING, M.D.

Background.

Prompt testing for influenza can help guide clinical management of patients with suspected influenza. Three antiviral medications, amantadine, oseltamivir and zanamivir, are approved for treatment of influenza in children. Rimantadine and ribavirin have also been used.

Objectives.

To review the published evidence on clinically useful diagnostic tests and antiviral treatment for influenza virus infections in children.

Methods.

Studies published from 1966 through September 2002 were reviewed on clinical diagnosis, immunofluorescence and rapid influenza tests and on antiviral treatment of influenza virus infections among pediatric populations.

Results.

No studies assessed the accuracy of clinical diagnosis of influenza in children compared with viral culture. Compared with viral culture, direct immunofluorescence antibody and indirect immunofluorescence antibody tests for influenza had fair to moderate median sensitivities and high median specificities, whereas rapid influenza diagnostic tests had moderate median sensitivities and moderately high median specificities. No randomized, placebo-controlled studies were found of amantadine or rimantadine for treatment of influenza A. In a few separate controlled studies, oseltamivir, zanamivir and ribavirin each reduced symptom duration of influenza compared with placebo.

Conclusions.

Additional data are needed about the accuracy of clinical diagnosis of influenza in children. Although direct immunofluorescence antibody staining, indirect immunofluorescence antibody staining and rapid tests are moderately to reasonably accurate in detecting influenza virus infections in children, physicians should use clinical judgment and local surveillance data about circulating influenza viruses when interpreting test results. Further controlled studies of the efficacy, adverse effects and emergence of antiviral resistance during treatment of influenza are needed for all of the antiviral drugs.

Key words: Influenza; children; influenza antivirals; direct fluorescence assay; in direct fluorescence assay; rapid influenza; diagnostic tests

From the Influenza Branch, Division of Viral and Rickettsial Diseases, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.

Accepted for publication Nov. 4, 2002.

Address for reprints: Dr. Tim Uyeki, MS A-32, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA 30333. Fax 404-639-3866; E-mail tuyeki@cdc.gov.

The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 2003; 22(2):164-177
All rights reserved

 

Vaccination News Home Page

ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE.  THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.