Vaccination News Home Page                                            subscribe Vaccination NewsLetter

http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/326/7385/365?etoc

PDF of this article Email this article to a friend Respond to this article PubMed citation Related articles in PubMed Download to Citation Manager Search Medline for articles by: Ramsay, M. E || Miller, E. Alert me when: New articles cite this article

Collections under which this article appears: Other Infectious Diseases Drugs: immunological products and vaccines Other Pediatrics

BMJ 2003;326:365-366 ( 15 February )

Papers

Herd immunity from meningococcal serogroup C conjugate vaccination in England: database analysis

Mary E Ramsay, consultant epidemiologist ^a, Nick J Andrews, statistician ^a, Caroline L Trotter, research scientist ^a, Edward B Kaczmarski, consultant microbiologist ^b, Elizabeth Miller, head of immunisation division ^a. 

^a Public Health Laboratory Service Communicable Disease Surveillance Centre, London, NW9 5EQ, ^b Public Health Laboratory Service Meningococcal Reference Unit, Manchester Public Health Laboratory, Manchester M20 2LR

Correspondence to: M E Ramsay
mramsay@phls.org.uk

In November 1999, the United Kingdom introduced routine meningococcal serogroup C conjugate vaccination for infants. The vaccine was also offered to everyone aged under 18 years in a phased catch-up programme.¹ The first to be vaccinated were adolescents, and the entire programme was completed by the end of 2000. On the basis of direct protection provided by the vaccine, ^{1 2} this catch-up programme was likely to be cost effective.³

Maiden et al described a 67% reduction (from 0.45% to 0.15%) in the prevalence of nasopharyngeal carriage of serogroup C meningococci in adolescents before and after the vaccination programme.⁴ A fall in meningococcal carriage would be expected to reduce exposure among unvaccinated children and therefore to enhance the effectiveness of meningococcal conjugate vaccine. We present rates of disease in vaccinated and unvaccinated children to provide the first evidence of an indirect effect from meningococcal conjugate vaccine.

	Methods and results

Top Methods and results Comment References

Since December 1999 we have investigated the vaccination history of all cases of serogroup C disease confirmed by the meningococcal reference unit of the Public Health Laboratory Service in age groups targeted for immunisation.¹ We collected data on vaccination coverage from immunisation coordinators and departments of child health in England.⁵ Between 1 July 2001 and 30 June 2002, we identified a total of 37 cases in the cohorts targeted for catch-up vaccination, eight (22%) in vaccinated children and 29 (78%) in unvaccinated children. We compared cases in unvaccinated children from each age group in the 2001-2 cohort with those in the same age groups for the period from 1 July 1998 to 30 June 1999. The denominator was mid-1999 population estimates from the Office for National Statistics for the age group, adjusted for the proportion of each cohort vaccinated.

Overall, in the age groups targeted for catch-up vaccination, a reduction of 67% (95% confidence interval 52% to 77%) in the attack rate occurred, with a range of 48% to 80% across the age groups (table). A smaller fall occurred in adults not eligible for vaccination (aged 25 years), for whom the incidence declined by 35% (20% to 49%) from 0.53 (193/36 315 726) to 0.34 (123/36 315 726) per 100 000.

Because of possible underestimation of coverage⁵ we recalculated the attack rates, assuming that coverage was 10% higher in adolescents and 5% higher in other children (based on our experience with other vaccines). The resulting overall estimate was of a 52% reduction (95% confidence interval 30% to 77%) in unvaccinated children; this included a 52% reduction (10% to 74%) in adolescents (where coverage was likely to be least accurate).

We estimated vaccine efficacy (the percentage reduction in attack rate in vaccinated compared with unvaccinated children) by using the same data sources and applying methods described previously.² From July 2001 to 30 June 2002 the attack rate in vaccinated children was 0.09/100 000 (8/9 119 078) corresponding to an overall vaccine efficacy of 94% (86% to 97%). Using the adjusted coverage we estimated an efficacy of 96% (91% to 98%).

	Comment

Top Methods and results Comment References

These data show that, in addition to direct protection, meningococcal conjugate vaccine contributes to the control of meningococcal infection by indirect protection, by reducing the attack rate in the unvaccinated population by 67%. These observations may be explained by a natural decline in the incidence of serogroup C disease, although this is unlikely. The reduction in the attack rate is consistent with a reduction in serogroup C carriage rates⁴ and goes against the trends in serogroup C disease before 2000¹ and in serogroup B disease. As adolescents are the only group in which carriage rates have been studied,⁴ these data provide more robust evidence of herd immunity across the whole population. Countries considering introducing meningococcal conjugate vaccine may wish to take account of this indirect protection in the economic evaluation of vaccine policy.

	Acknowledgments

Contributors: MER and EM conceived and designed the study. EBK provided the data on cases of meningococcal disease. NJA and CLT conducted the statistical analyses. MER wrote the first draft of the paper; CLT revised the paper. All authors contributed to the interpretation of the data, and all authors read, commented on, and approved the final draft of the paper. MER is the guarantor.

	Footnotes

Funding: The Public Health Laboratory Service Meningococcal Reference Unit received support for follow up of cases from Wyeth Lederle, Chiron, and Baxter.

Competing interests: EM, MER, and EBK have received research grants from vaccine manufacturers. EM, EBK, MER, and NJA have received support for attending conferences and meetings from vaccine manufacturers.

Ethical approval: The Public Health Laboratory Service has approval under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act to process confidential information about patients for the purposes of monitoring the efficacy and safety of vaccination programmes.

	References

Top Methods and results Comment References

(Accepted 7 November 2002)
 

© 2003 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd


 

PDF of this article Email this article to a friend Respond to this article PubMed citation Related articles in PubMed Download to Citation Manager Search Medline for articles by: Ramsay, M. E || Miller, E. Alert me when: New articles cite this article

Collections under which this article appears: Other Infectious Diseases Drugs: immunological products and vaccines Other Pediatrics

© 2003 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd

Vaccination News Home Page

ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE.  THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.