Double helix
photo not taken by Franklin
24 April 2003
15:00 GMT
by Henry Nicholls
The famous 'photograph 51' of DNA
that James Watson claims led him and
Francis Crick directly to the
discovery of the double helix, was
not, after all, taken by Rosalind
Franklin as is widely held, but by
Raymond Gosling, her PhD student at
King's College London.
Photograph 51 has always been
attributed to Rosalind Franklin, the
talented physical chemist at King's
College London, whose research
involved taking unique X-ray
photographs of DNA. This single image,
above all else, has come to signify
Franklin's incredible contribution to
the discovery, for which, some say,
she has never received the recognition
she deserved. But it now transpires
that the iconic photograph 51 was
taken by her postgraduate student,
Raymond Gosling.
"I took photograph 51," Gosling
told BioMedNet News, a claim
supported by Franklin's biographer,
Brenda Maddox, in a special report on
BioMedNet News & Features.
"I think you probably could say that
Gosling took it," she agreed.
According to James Watson's
dramatized account of the discovery of
the double helix, his preview of this
particular X-ray image of DNA was a
revelation that led the Cambridge duo
directly to the structure of the
double helix. Watson had been casually
shown the photo by Maurice Wilkins,
assistant head of Franklin's
department. "The instant I saw the
picture my mouth fell open and my
pulse began to race," wrote Watson in
The Double Helix.
Although the ownership of this
photograph does not diminish
Franklin's crucial role in the DNA
story, it does change how Gosling
should be viewed, says James Tait, who
together with his late wife Sylvia
Simpson and Tadeus Reichstein revealed
the molecular structure of aldosterone
in 1953, a discovery that at the time
received much wider publicity than did
the double helix discovery.
"I think the real martyr of the
story is Gosling and not Franklin,"
said Tait, who is to publish a book on
the events of 1953. "I don't suppose
Gosling would ever have got [the Nobel
prize], but he was involved in all the
work," he said.
Watson's adventitious glimpse of
photograph 51 stimulated him to resume
model building, but another lead came
from a Medical Research Council report
on King's College that Cavendish
colleague, Max Perutz, leaked to
Watson and Crick the following week.
This contained details of Franklin and
Gosling's unpublished research, from
which Crick would work out that DNA
was comprised of two helical and
anti-parallel strands.
"We all knew that they had access
to the MRC report that Rosalind and I
wrote earlier, which had the
dimensions of the helix, phosphate
groups on the outside and number of
nucleotides in the unit cell along the
fibre axis," said Gosling.
The structure of DNA was revealed
to the world in three articles in a
single issue of Nature
published on 25 April 1953. The first
of the trio of articles was the famous
letter by Watson and Crick that
brought them credit for unraveling the
detailed structure of the double
helix. The third of the trio was an
article by Franklin and Gosling, which
included much of the unpublished data,
including photograph 51, that the
Cambridge team had been privy to in
the MRC report.

|
Send
us your
comments for publication.
|
| Sign
up for BioMedNet News
weekly
email alerts. |
Credit:
Photograph 51. Raymond Gosling, King's
College London