Lung hot spots concentrate carcinogens
Computer model highlights
cells at cancer risk.
18 April 2003
HELEN PEARSON
 |
Forks in the lung,
where
air moves more
slowly,
catch crud. |
|
© T. Heistracher |
|
|
Certain spots in the lungs may accumulate massively
more cancer-causing airborne particles than was
previously thought, according to a new model1. It
suggests that some safe limits for pollutants could be
underestimates.
Cells on the spurs between airways build up inhaled
carcinogens to concentrations at least 100 times higher
than elsewhere in the lung, says Thomas Heistracher of
the Polytechnical University of Salzburg, Austria.
Heistracher and his colleagues used a computer model
to simulate the breathing lung - and the hundreds of
millions of dust, smoke and other particles that are
sucked in and out with each breath.
Some current pollution regulations ignore local lung
buildups that could spawn cancer, says team member,
Werner Hofmann of the University of Salzburg. "It means
you should reduce your [allowable] concentrations," he
says.
But the modeling method needs to be confirmed with
further experiments before regulatory agencies - such as
the US Environmental Protection Agency - take it into
account says Michael Oldham, who studies lung pollution
at the University of California at Irvine. "[The method]
is still relatively new," he explains.
Heistracher's team is one of several that are
developing simulations of airflow during breathing,
using a technology also employed in aircraft design. "It
gives precise predictions of where particles will land
in 3D space," says Oldham.
The work supports the long-held idea that that forks
in the lung catch crud. Before computer models,
researchers puffed fumes into plastic or rubber lungs
and watched debris collect.
|
The model
gives precise
predictions of
where
particles will
land in 3D
space
|
|
Michael Oldham
University of
California at
Irvine
|
|
|
But exactly how these hotspots harm lung tissue is
unclear. Some particles are washed away by mucus and
coughing; others - such as tobacco smoke - are not,
hence the dry, hacking cough of a smoker.
Other factors - such as how a pollutant is inhaled -
also affect its distribution, points out Naiyer Rizvi,
who works on lung cancer at the Memorial Sloan-Kettering
Cancer Center in New York. High-tar cigarettes leave
deposits high up in the lungs, lower-tar ones stain
deeper in the lungs because smokers suck on them harder.
Some studies have found a correlation between the
sites of lung cancer and the pollutant hotspots. But
Rizvi points out that a tumour's origin can be tough to
pin down, as tumours often reach several centimetres in
diameter before they are found. "I don't think there's a
magic spot you can look for," he says. |