FDA chief pledges changes to direct-to-consumer advertising
guidelines
Physicians welcome better enforcement and
easier-to-understand summary information, but most would also like to see
an increase in patient educational value.
By
Victoria Stagg Elliott, AMNews staff.
April 28, 2003.
The Food and Drug Administration is working to improve
rules governing direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription drugs.
The agency is aiming to better enforce guidelines and to become a more
effective deterrent to misleading ads, according to a speech made earlier
this month by FDA Commissioner Mark B. McClellan, MD, PhD.
"Physicians and others are concerned that consumers may not always get
a balanced view of the benefits and risks of a product," said Dr.
McClellan, speaking to the Food and Drug Law Institute, an association of
manufacturers and suppliers subject to FDA regulation.
Specifically, the agency is working on new materials to guide
manufacturers in providing consumers with summary information, based on
the drug labels, that is more useful and easily understood. The agency is
focusing on ensuring that FDA warning letters will strengthen enforcement
efforts in legal actions, providing more effective deterrence to recurrent
patterns of misleading advertising.
The FDA declined to reveal any further details, but physicians said
such steps would be a welcome move.
"We applaud that," said AMA President Yank D. Coble Jr., MD.
|
Studies support the connection between DTC ads and
increases in drug spending and use.
|
Doctors have been complaining for years that direct-to-consumer
advertising costs them time when they have to address patients' concerns
raised by the ads. They also say the ads cost the health system money by
ginning up consumer demand for new and often expensive prescription drugs
when less advertised and less pricey ones may be just as good. Several
studies support the connection between DTC ads and increases in drug
spending and utilization.
"Many advertisements confuse patients and increase the cost of medical
care," said J. Willis Hurst, MD, professor emeritus for the Dept. of
Medicine at Emory University in Atlanta.
Resolutions calling for bans on such ads are a regular topic of debate
at AMA meetings, but have yet to pass, primarily because of the
unfeasibility of a ban. Also, physicians recognize that DTC ads can bring
patients into the office for help with medical conditions that they
wouldn't otherwise have brought to their doctors' attention.
"The fact is that direct-to-consumer advertising does provide a service
to us," said Michael Fleming, MD, president-elect of the American Academy
of Family Physicians. "It does make people aware of diseases."
What many physicians would like to see are significant changes in the
advertisements themselves.
"Our fighting for it to go away isn't going to work," said Stuart
Gitlow, MD, MPH, an addiction psychiatrist from Providence, R.I. "Let's
work for something that the public, the [drug companies], and the doctors
can all live with."
At the AMA 2002 Interim Meeting, the Association adopted a policy on
DTC advertising that calls for an emphasis on patient education about
select diseases rather than a single drug, and for a clear message that
any decision about whether to take a particular drug be made in
consultation with a physician.
But in addition to changes in the rules, many doctors are particularly
keen to see improvements in enforcement, as promised by Dr. McClellan. A
report from the General Accounting Office found that regulatory letters
meant to inform companies that an ad was in violation of FDA rules were
sometimes sent out long after the ad campaign was over.
"Any serious effort to address this will require a major infusion of
resources because timing is everything," said Richard Kravitz, MD, MSPH,
director of the Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care at the
University of California, Davis.
A Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America spokesman had no
comment because the FDA's exact plans were not available.
Back to top.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
Evolution of DTC ads
1962: Power to regulate advertising of
prescription drugs transferred from Federal Trade Commission to Food
and Drug Administration.
Early 1980s: Pharmaceutical manufacturers
experiment with prescription drug direct-to-consumer advertising.
1982: FDA declares moratorium on DTC
advertising.
1985: FDA lifts moratorium, but
stipulates that ads directed at consumers must meet the same
standards as those targeting professionals.
1989: $12 million annually is spent on
DTC advertising.<
1996: Spending on DTC advertising hits
$596 million per year.
1997: FDA reinterprets advertising rules
to allow prescription drugs to be advertised on television and
radio.
2001: Spending on DTC advertising
increases to $2.7 billion annually.
Source: Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, Fall 2002
Back to top.
Copyright 2003 American Medical Association. All
rights reserved.