Clinicians tested by MMR controversy

Vaccination News Home Page                                            subscribe Vaccination NewsLetter

http://news.bmn.com/news/story?day=030417&story=2

 
Journal
Collection
Reviews Research
Update
Research
Tools
News &
Features
Books &
Labware
Science
Jobs
news.bmn.com Latest
Updates
Today's
News
Magazine Conference
Reporter
Commentary Journal
Scan
Special
Report
My E-mail
Alerts
Section
Search
  My BMN My BMN Exit Exit  
  Send Feedback to BMN Feedback Help System Help  


 

Today's News
 Front Page
 News Archive
 Send us News Tips


 

Quick Site Search

 

Advanced site search


 

 


 

- 17 April 2003
Today's News Stories
News Archive
     
Clinicians tested by MMR controversy

16 April 2003 17:00 GMT

by Henry Nicholls

Oxford - Further testing of the hypothesis that the 3-in-1 measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine causes autism is impossible, say researchers. Worse, they add, it is unethical.

The putative link between MMR vaccination and autism was first published in 1998 by Andrew Wakefield and colleagues at the Royal Free Hospital in London. The hypothesis emerged on the back of a growing body of parental reports of an apparent association between a steady increase in diagnosed cases of autism and the introduction of the MMR vaccine.

But these are no more than temporal associations, says Elizabeth Miller, epidemiologist and head of the Immunization Division of the UK government's Public Health Laboratory Service

"The hypothesis was perfectly reasonable to generate given the observations," Miller told delegates at the 3rd International meeting of the Edward Jenner Institute for Vaccine Research, here in Oxford. But almost every one of the dozen-or-so studies to test Wakefield's hypothesis has failed to support it, she says. "He rejects these studies on the basis that they're not testing the hypothesis, but that's because the hypothesis keeps on evolving," she said.

For example, following initial studies that did not demonstrate a link, the hypothesis shifted to one that suggested an association would only be detected in the presence of other factors, such as antibiotics and atopy, says Miller.

The latest incarnation of the hypothesis, she says, is that the vaccinated measles virus persists in the gut of those with autism. "It's now evolved into a place where the hypothesis is untestable," said Miller. There is no ethical reason for gastroenterologists to take biopsies from children, she says, which would be necessary to put the hypothesis to the test.

Furthermore, there is strong criticism of the technique, immunogold electron microscopy, with which Wakefield claims to have identified measles virus in the gut. "The reagent they used to demonstrate the presence of the measles ... is wholly non-specific," said John Hermon-Taylor, chairman of the Department of Surgery at St George's Hospital Medical School in London. "The science is flawed," he said.

Miller agrees. "I don't think Wakefield is operating with the conventional scientific method," she told BioMedNet News.

The potentially fatal childhood diseases measles, mumps, and rubella had been virtually absent from the UK since the government introduced the MMR program in 1988. However, Wakefield's evolving hypothesis has led parents to seek alternative immunization through private routes or to shun vaccination altogether, resulting in local outbreaks of these diseases around the country.

The first signs are appearing of an increase in these diseases where vaccination is rejected. "We're now seeing significant outbreaks in these low-coverage communities," said Miller. If coverage of MMR vaccination does not improve, these dangerous viral diseases will become increasingly common within a matter of years, she warns.

In spite of the combined evidence of numerous studies, the British public remains wary of governmental advice on health issues in the absence of an alternative explanation for the rise in autism and, especially, in the wake of government mismanagement of the BSE crisis and foot-and-mouth disease. Some 1500 families have been given legal aid to bring a court case against the main manufacturers of the MMR vaccine. Miller expressed hope that this will lay the controversy to rest once and for all.


 
 
Send us your comments for publication.
 
 
Sign up for BioMedNet News weekly email alerts.


 

 





 

See also:
Rubella eradication [Review]
Stanley A. Plotkin
The virulence of rubella virus for the fetus was fully defined between 1963 and 1965 when an epidemic of rubella occurred in Europe and the US, followed by a wave...
Vaccine, 2001, 19:25-26:3311 - 3319

New study fails to find link between MMR and autism [In brief]
H. Marshall
A new study published in the British Medical Journal failed to find any temporal link between the rise in autism and the prevalence of MMR vaccine usage. The report, based...
Trends in Immunology, 2001, 22:4:185

Measles outbreaks on the horizon? [In Brief]
Hilary Marshall
Members of a panel speaking at a public debate at the British Society for Immunology Annual Congress (6-8 December 2000; Harrogate, UK) expressed serious concerns that there could be outbreaks...
Trends in Immunology, 2001, 22:1:14
 




 
Today's News Stories
News Archive


BioMedNet
Home
News &
Features
My BMN
 
Help System
 
Send Feedback to BMN
 
Information for Advertisers © Elsevier Limited 2003

 

Vaccination News Home Page

ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR LEGAL ADVICE.  THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.