Interventions to Reduce Sexual Risk for the Human Immunodeficiency
Virus in Adolescents, 1985-2000
A Research Synthesis
Blair T. Johnson, PhD; Michael P. Carey, PhD;
Kerry L. Marsh, PhD; Kenneth D. Levin, PhD;
Lori A. J. Scott-Sheldon, MA
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003;157:381-388.
Objective To summarize studies that have tested the
efficacy of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) sexual
risk-reduction interventions in adolescents.
Data Sources Reports were gathered from computerized
databases, by contacting individual researchers, by
searching conference proceedings and relevant journals,
and by reviewing reference sections of obtained articles.
Study Selection Studies were included if they
investigated any educational, psychosocial, or behavioral
intervention advocating sexual risk reduction for HIV
prevention; used experimental designs (or other designs
with adequate comparison groups); had
behavioral-dependent measures relevant to sexual risk; sampled
adolescents (age range, 11-18 years); and had sufficient
information to calculate effect size (ES) estimates. Data
from 44 studies and 56 interventions (N = 35 282
participants) that were available as of January 2, 2001,
were included.
Data Extraction Study information was coded, and
individual ESs were calculated in SD units (the
difference between the intervention and comparison
condition means, divided by the pooled SD), with ESs
coded so that positive signs indicated greater risk
reduction.
Data Synthesis Across the studies, reductions in sexual
risk were greater for adolescents who received the HIV
risk-reduction intervention compared with those in the
comparison conditions for 5 dimensions: condom use
negotiation skills (mean ES, 0.50; 95% confidence
interval [CI], 0.41-0.59), condom use skills (mean ES,
0.30; 95% CI, 0.09-0.51), communications with sexual
partners (mean ES, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.19-0.36), condom use (mean
ES, 0.07; 95% CI, 0.03-0.11), and sexual frequency (mean ES,
0.05; 95% CI, 0.02-0.09). Interventions achieved greater
success with condom use (1) in noninstitutionalized
populations, (2) when condoms were provided, (3) with
more condom information and skills training, (4) when the
comparison group received less HIV skills training, and
(5) when the comparison group received more
nonHIV-related sexual education.
Conclusion Intensive behavioral interventions reduced
sexual HIV risk, especially because they increased skill
acquisition, sexual communications, and condom use and
decreased the onset of sexual intercourse or the number
of sexual partners.
From the
Center for Health/HIV Intervention and Prevention, University of
Connecticut, Storrs (Drs Johnson and Marsh and Ms Scott-Sheldon);
the Center for Health and Behavior, Syracuse University, Syracuse,
NY (Dr Carey); and Digitas, LLC, Boston, Mass (Dr Levin).
RELATED ARTICLES IN ARCHIVES OF
PEDIATRICS & ADOLESCENT MEDICINE
Human Immunodeficiency Virus Prevention for Adolescents:
Windows of Opportunity for Optimizing Intervention Effectiveness
Ralph J. DiClemente and Gina M. Wingood
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003;157:319-320.
FULL TEXT
|