Thoughts from a Hot Zone: Give Me a New Immune System
The SARS scare in Toronto shows how bad a looming epidemic would be. There's
little we can do to prevent it, so bring on the nanobots
Monday, April 07, 2003, 7:01:26 AM CT
I was initially cynical. Yes, thousands of people had SARS. But very few had
died. Despite the emails describing the illness in apocalyptic terms, it was
still far riskier to drive a car than randomly hug subway riders. I wouldn't
take a trip to China, but I wasn't going to alter my life much.
Or so I thought.
That was two weeks ago, before Toronto became a hot zone and Severe Acute
Respiratory Syndrome hit home. Hospitals closed. Newspapers started running
daily updates. Surgical masks became sought-after fashion accessories and
quickly sold out everywhere.
Then my partner, Paula, entered voluntary quarantine after visiting a
hospital in which a patient was found to have the illness. The hospital became a
SARS-cophagus -- all sealed up, with nobody but healthcare workers allowed in.
An aunt and cousin who attended the same hospital also entered isolation.
Now I've gone from cynical to seriously concerned. SARS is the warning shot:
An epidemic looms that could kill millions -- or hundreds of millions. And while
better than inaction, closing hospitals, stopping air travel, warning tourists,
disinfecting counters, wearing masks and quarantining lovers will never prevent
an epidemic from wiping out swaths of people.
"Infectious agents will always be present in the natural environment and
their evolution into new forms will continue for the foreseeable future," says
Robert A. Freitas Jr., a nanotechnology researcher and the author of
Nanomedicine, a massive compilation of nanotech solutions to health problems.
"So microbes will continue to attempt to colonize human bodies."
What we need is a better immune system.
Fortunately, Freitas has designed one.
Know your enemy
As of Friday, April 4, SARS had infected 18 countries. Worldwide, there were
2,400 cases and 80 deaths from the illness.
About 10% to 20% of SARS sufferers will require mechanical ventilation. About
four percent will die -- equivalent to the death rate from the flu. There are no
treatment protocols, but antibiotics, antivirals and steroids have shown some
benefit.
Doctors believe that SARS is mainly spread through droplet transmission --
coughing and sneezing. Most transmission involves direct contact with an
infected person. Healthcare workers are especially vulnerable.
A previously unrecognized coronavirus is likely the culprit. With a
crown-like appearance, coronaviruses commonly cause mild respiratory illnesses.
This one, apparently, is far more severe.
The next epidemic
Are we on the verge of another disaster, one reminiscent of last century's
Spanish Flu? That epidemic swept the globe from 1918 to 1920, left a billion
people sick -- more than half of the world's population at the time -- and
killed at least 40 million people -- four times the death toll of World War I.
Since the Spanish Flu, two other big pandemics have struck, one in 1957 and
one in 1968. Both were responsible for millions of deaths.
There's no way of knowing when we'll have the next.
Environmental changes can benefit microbes that cause infectious diseases.
Microbes also typically have high replication rates, allowing them to colonize
and mutate quickly. High mutation rates help microbes evade our immune system
and such technological defenses as antibiotics.
The flu virus is particularly dangerous. It can live in humans, birds and
other animals, and some strains can survive on exposed surfaces. The flu is also
highly contagious because it spreads through the air. And its replication method
is highly prone to mutations, so it's hard to fight.
Then, of course, there's bioterrorism. With a little help from humans with
ill intentions, microbes can become even more virulent and deadly.
Battling microbes
Don't get me wrong, we've come a long way since Dutch merchant Antoni van
Leeuwenhoek first looked at a living microbe in the 17th century. (He wanted to
examine the quality of cloth, and made a powerful magnifying glass that he
eventually used to find "little animals" -- microbes -- in drops of water.)
About 200 years later, Louis Pasteur theorized that microbes involved in wine
fermentation might also cause illness.
From there, we developed pasteurization, antibiotics, antivirals, vaccines
and other treatments.
Our success has led to expectations that advances in existing treatments will
eliminate all infectious agents.
But even with our high technology, dumb packages of harmful, replicating
genetic material humble us. Despite all our medical advancements, we're still
vulnerable to the ravages of randomly mutated viruses.
Also, war and natural disasters create environments in which infectious
agents thrive, changes in human activity expose us to new pathogens and bacteria
can develop antibiotic resistance.
So how can we hope to prevent a future epidemic?
Nano defenders
Enter the microbivore.
One of Freitas's many medical nanobot designs, microbivores would patrol your
bloodstream to find and digest pathogens such as bacteria, viruses and fungi.
Each microbivore could destroy one pathogen in 30 seconds -- about 100 times
faster than a natural leukocyte or macrophage, says Freitas. The robots could
eliminate the most severe infections, he says, in minutes to hours.
And if properly designed, says Freitas, microbivores should be able to detect
and eliminate virtually any biological pathogen. They could even destroy viruses
with high mutation rates, such as the flu, he says, by targeting their genes.
"By the time a molecular manufacturing technology exists that can build
medical nanobots, this same technology will make possible the performance of
comprehensive microbial assays of tiny blood and tissue samples, with full
genomic characterization of all microbes detected, on a timescale of minutes
after extraction from the patient," says Freitas.
Even rapidly mutating viruses could be detected through genomics, with
microbivores seeking their genetic sequence. "Treatment time should again be on
the order of hours or less, even for previously unknown pathogens," says
Freitas.
The long wait
Of course, microbivores are nowhere near reality.
Researchers are making steady gains in nanoscale engineering, but have yet to
produce programmable nanobots.
Until they do, we'll just have to battle with what's at hand, and quarantine
the sick and possibly infected, even when they're close to us.
And we'll just have to hope that nanobots join our arsenal before the next
epidemic.
Simon Smith is the founder and editor-in-chief of Betterhumans. You can reach
him at simon@betterhumans.com.
ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND
MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION
PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS
OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR
LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND
COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH
YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.
"A foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth."
-- Albert Einstein, letter to a friend, 1901
"I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves, and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education."
-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to William C. Jarvis, September 28, 1820
"What's the point of vaccination if it doesn't protect you from the unvaccinated?"
-- Sandy Gottstein
"Who gets to decide what the greater good is and how many will be sacrificed to it?"