University of Wisconsin-Madison and Harvard University scientists have
achieved a major milestone toward developing an antidote to the deadly anthrax
toxin.
While more testing is needed, some say the work might offer the possibility
of experimental use of the antidote if another anthrax attack were to occur.
In October 2001, as anthrax was being spread by mail, the researchers
discovered a chemical door that the anthrax toxin uses to enter cells and then
made a decoy substance to attract the poison to it instead of the cells.
Now they've discovered a second point of entry and made another decoy
substance that's even more potent.
"It's about 25-fold better than the first one we had," said John Young, the
UW cancer professor who led the research in Madison and will publish its results
this week in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
The work was part of anti-bioterrorism research that was fast-tracked and
funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.
Although researchers still need to test the antitoxin decoys in animals and
fine-tune them chemically, the decoys might now be a potential emergency
treatment.
"This certainly approaches that," said Phillip Baker, who supervises grants
for research on a host of biowarfare germs for the infectious diseases
institute.
"It could be scaled up quickly," Young agreed. "The hope would be that it
would be quick enough to be useful if a need came along like that."
Antibiotics can kill anthrax in the early stages of infection, but symptoms
often aren't recognized until after the bacteria have started producing toxin
that can rapidly cause death.
"Anthrax toxins have to get into cells to do their damage," so finding out
how they do that and blocking it are what's needed in order to develop a
successful antidote, Baker explained.
The UW and Harvard researchers now have found two points of entry, or
receptors, on cells that allow the toxin to connect and be taken inside the
cell. The decoys are free-floating chemical pieces of those receptors. When the
toxin attaches to the decoy pieces, it is neutralized and is no longer capable
of binding to and getting inside of cells.
"If you have two decoys like this it's better than one" because the anthrax
germ might be engineered by a bioterrorist to make a toxin that can evade one
mechanism, Baker said.
Test tube experiments have shown the decoys to be effective, and the Harvard
team under well-known anthrax researcher John Collier has tested them in rats,
although the results have not yet been published.
"All I can say is it shows promising results," Young said.
Similar experiments in people probably could never be done, aside from trying
the decoys in an emergency situation, because it would be unethical to
deliberately infect people with a deadly germ such as anthrax. But Baker said
the lab experiments on human cells suggest encouraging things about their
safety.
A version of this story appeared in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel on
April 8, 2003.
ALL INFORMATION, DATA, AND
MATERIAL CONTAINED, PRESENTED, OR PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION
PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS REFLECTING THE KNOWLEDGE OR OPINIONS
OF THE PUBLISHER, AND IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED OR INTENDED AS PROVIDING MEDICAL OR
LEGAL ADVICE. THE DECISION WHETHER OR NOT TO VACCINATE IS AN IMPORTANT AND
COMPLEX ISSUE AND SHOULD BE MADE BY YOU, AND YOU ALONE, IN CONSULTATION WITH
YOUR HEALTH CARE PROVIDER.
"A foolish faith in authority is the worst enemy of truth."
-- Albert Einstein, letter to a friend, 1901
"I know of no safe depository of the ultimate powers of the society but the people themselves, and if we think them not enlightened enough to exercise control with a wholesome discretion, the remedy is not to take it from them, but to inform their discretion by education."
-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to William C. Jarvis, September 28, 1820
"What's the point of vaccination if it doesn't protect you from the unvaccinated?"
-- Sandy Gottstein
"Who gets to decide what the greater good is and how many will be sacrificed to it?"