|
|
Who’s On First? The Sometimes Zany World of Twitter by Sandy Gottstein
These days I seem to be spending my
life on Twitter as it has enormous potential to reach vast numbers of
people. Recently I got embroiled in a loony Twitter thread involving
the fact that breast-feeding is thought to be protective against
Haemophilus Influenzae B (Hib). I
decided to share it because a) Japan just suspended 2
vaccines after 4 deaths were associated with them, one of which
was Hib, and b) it exemplifies how ridiculous many of the
unquestioningly pro-vaccine people’s arguments can be, if you can
call them that.
Hib is an issue I have been aware of
for years because the Hib
vaccine came out when my younger son was in Montessori preschool.
Having previously stopped almost all vaccines (by 1987, reluctantly
sticking with the one for tetanus), I was wary to now introduce a new
one. So I did some research. What I discovered gave me the
information and courage I needed at the time to avoid the Hib vaccine
since even back then there was evidence that breastfeeding was
protective against Hib, and my son was still nursing.
It all started when someone tweeted,
“Why do we vaccinate against Hib?”
I “replied” that breastfeeding is
protective against Hib and provided this old link:
http://www.vaccinationnews.com/DailyNews/May2001/Breastfeeding.htm
The entire thing, not surprisingly,
degenerated into accusations that I am anti-vaccine and “opposed
preventing suffering and death”. (I mean, who doesn’t?)
When I followed with a bunch of
breastfeeding
and
Hib
articles, including a couple that I noted did not support
my thesis, and explained that I wasn’t “promoting” anything,
just providing links to medical literature regarding the issue, I was
told that I was advocating breastfeeding over vaccinating and that I
only had to “ask mothers of babies dying of pertussis if you
agree”. (Say what?) And to carry on with my “stupidity” since
I apparently didn’t care about children dying of pertussis. I was
then chastised for being a “tool” because I was “scouring
twitter to start arguments”.
Of course my replying, among other
things, that I was only trying to provide information fell on deaf
ears.
After having an apparent pediatrician
deliver her pronouncement that “Every baby needs Hib vaccine-
breastfed or not- period...”, I noted that another
pediatrician had asked this question: "Did we trade invasive
Hib for pneumococcal invasive disease?" Then I posted some VAERS
data (1,2)
that
showed
a large number of reported serious adverse conjugated Hib
vaccine-associated reactions, including death, noting that we did not
know the actual numbers or their true significance (“tip
of
the
iceberg”? causally related?). As well as posting a link
to Hilary
Butler’s excellent piece “The
Perilous
Hib”.
Someone then really laid into me with
this cogent question “... Is it ONLY the literature that supports
your argument? “ Um, yes.
I was then accused of all sorts of
things which are now missing because I blocked a tweeter after he
falsely accused me of saying things I never said and then attacked me
when I responded. (He then threatened to block me if I didn’t
behave, so I beat him to the punch.)
There was lots more, but you get the
gist.
It was all par for the course;
irrational, crazy-making by smug and mean people who congratulate
themselves for caring about diseases, but don’t give a hoot about
vaccine injury or death. Kinda’ like trying to herd eels. Or like
trying to make sense of Abbott and Costello in their famous skit,
Who’s on
first?
It would be hilarious if it was funny.
It’s not all bad news, though. The
more they dig in their heels, the more they twist our words and the
truth, the more they call us names, it would appear the more
people question the safety of vaccines. 54% of parents, according to
Pediatrics, are
now “concerned about serious
adverse
effects of vaccines”. Moreover, “nearly
9
in
10 parents rank vaccine safety, and the effectiveness and
safety of medicines, as the most important topics in children’s
health research today”. This is a sea-change in attitude. (Appropriate
for eel herding?) And good news indeed.
by Sandy Gottstein
“Eternal
vigilance is the price of liberty.” – Wendell Phillips
(1811-1884), paraphrasing John Philpot Curran
|
|